Journal Information
Vol. 14. Issue 6.
Pages 379-381 (November - December 2018)
Visits
5122
Vol. 14. Issue 6.
Pages 379-381 (November - December 2018)
Case Report
Full text access
Rituximab Therapy in Necrotizing Autoimmune Myopathy Associated With Anti-SRP Antibody: A Clinical Case Review
Tratamiento con rituximab para las miopatías necrosantes autoinmunes asociadas al anti-SRP: caso clínico y revisión de la evidencia
Visits
5122
Francisco Javier Nóvoa Medinaa,
Corresponding author
fnovmed@hotmail.es

Corresponding author.
, José Gutiérrez Martínezb, Yeray González Gonzálezc, Beatriz Romero Díazc, Sergio Machín Garcíaa, Antonio Rosas Romeroa
a Servicio de Reumatología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
b Servicio de Neurología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
c Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Abstract

Necrotizing autoimmune myopathy (NAM) is a rare and emerging entity of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM).

They have been associated with connective tissue disorders, viral infections, malignancy, anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) and anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase protein (with or without the use of statins).

Anti-SRP-associated NAM has different clinical and histological characteristics that differentiate them from other IIMs, resulting in a poor prognosis. Very few cases treated with rituximab have been published, with varying clinical response.

Here we describe a case of anti-SRP-associated NAM refractory to conventional immunosuppressants and its successful long-term management with the combination of rituximab, corticosteroids and methotrexate.

Keywords:
Necrotizing autoimmune myopathy
Anti-signal recognition particle
Rituximab
Resumen

Las miopatías necrosantes autoinmunes (NAM) son unas entidades raras y emergentes de las miopatías inflamatorias idiopáticas (MII).

Su presencia se ha asociado a conectivopatías, infecciones virales, neoplasias, anticuerpos frente a la partícula de reconocimiento de la señal (anti-SRP) y a anticuerpos frente a la proteína 3-hidroxi-3-metilglutaril-coenzima A reductasa (HMG-CR) (asociada al empleo o no de estatinas).

Las NAM asociadas al anti-SRP presentan unas características clínicas y anatomopatológicas que las diferencian del resto de las MII, resultando en un peor pronóstico. Hasta el momento han sido muy pocos los casos publicados tratados con rituximab y con diferente respuesta clínica.

Presentamos el caso de una mujer de 30 años con NAM asociada al anti-SRP refractaria a tratamiento convencional inmunosupresor y que ha sido controlada a largo plazo con la combinación de rituximab, metotrexato y corticoides.

Palabras clave:
Miopatías necrosantes autoinmunes
Partícula de reconocimiento de la señal
Rituximab
Full Text
Introduction

Necrotizing autoimmune myopathies (NAMs) usually present as a myopathy with marked elevation of creatine kinase (CK), characteristic histopathological findings (presence of necrotic and regenerative muscular fibres, near absence of inflammatory cell infiltrate) and poor response to standard treatment.

Anti-signal recognition particle (anti-SRP) antibodies were described for the first time in 19861 and later were described in patients diagnosed with inflammatory myopathies (IMs) with a more severe disease course. The anti-SRP antibodies are directed against a sub-unit of 54kDa of several ribonucleoproteins with GTPase activated involved in the transport of new proteins to the endoplasmatic reticulum.2–4

Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeted at CD20, the use of which is standard in other connective tissue disorders.5 A series of published cases of NAM exist which were treated with rituximab, with varying clinical responses.6–10

Clinical Case

A female aged 30 was diagnosed with NAM as a result of the presence of proximal myopathy, dysphagia to liquids and dysphonia of 2-month onset, elevation of muscular enzymes (CK 5.922UI/l, aldolase 84UI/l), electromyography with myopathic pattern, signs of intramuscular oedema on the magnetic resonance in shoulder and pelvic girdles (Fig. 1a) and anatomical–pathological findings of necrotic myopathy which had defied standard treatment (corticoids, inmunoglobulins, azathioprine).

Figure 1.

(a) Baseline MRI (T1 sequence). There is minimal oedema in the distal end of both the sartorius and gracilis muscles. Compromise of both compartments, with the lateral mass more affected in the anterior compartment and the middle masses more affected in the posterior compartment. In general, there is greater posterior compromise (arrow). (b) MRI after treatment with rituximab (T1 sequence). Bilateral and symmetrical compromise is noted of both compartments with muscular atrophy observed with diffuse fatty deposits. The lateral and middle masses are more affected in the anterior compartment and the hamstring muscles are more affected in the posterior compartment, with predominance of compromise in the posterior compartment (arrow).

(0.08MB).

As a result of histological findings, anti-SRP antibodies were requested which resulted positive (IFI 1:1.280 technique). Treatment was initiated with methotrexate (up to 30mg per week). Clinical symptoms improved after 3 months with the exception of the iliacus-psoas musculature (4/5). Progressive reduction of corticoids resulted in clinical and analytical deterioration. Concomitant treatment was subsequently started with rituximab (two 1-g doses). Five months later, the patient's condition was improved. After 6 months, a new cycle of rituximab was begun to maintain therapy response.

Magnetic resonance of the muscles after 2 years showed an absence of any signs of inflammatory activity (Fig. 1b).

As methotrexate was lowered below 22.5mg per week, the patient again began to be clinically and analytically compromised, and the dose was therefore increased to regain clinical control in the last year (with the exception of iliacus-psoas musculature weakness).

Discussion

To our knowledge, less than 30 cases of anti-SRP NAMs treated with rituximab have been published.6–10 Pinal-Fernandez et al.7 describe 17 patients treated with rituximab, which was apparently effective in 13 of them. The duration of the biological effect of the rituximab was variable (from 6 to 9 months to over more than 2 years). In our patient, it has not been administered on more occasions since mid-2012.

Two refractory cases were also published which improved with the combination of corticoids, plasmapheresis and rituximab,8 as well as another two cases treated with rituximab with favourable outcomes.9

However, a British series10 of two patients treated with rituximab presented a poor clinical response.

In our case, two cycles of rituximab were administered, leading to an exacerbation on reduction of the dose of methotexate, with favourable subsequent control when the dose was increased. The CK values of the patient were lower than that published in other series and this may be one of the reasons why a good therapeutic outcome was achieved. The imaging findings were also of note, where greater compromise of the posterior thigh compartment was noted when there were no apparent clinical signs of this.

Conclusion

NAMs should be suspected in patients with atypical findings, of MII, both histopathologically (presence of necrotic muscular fibres, near absence of inflammatory cell infiltrate) and clinically (poor response to immunosuppressants).

Rituximab could be a good therapeutic option for those cases where standard treatment has failed.

Ethical LiabilitiesProtection of people and animals

The authors declare that no experiments using human beings or animals have been carried out for this research study.

Data confidentiality

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References
[1]
W.H. Reeves, S.K. Nigam, G. Blobel.
Human autoantibodies reactive with the signal recognition particle.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 83 (1986), pp. 9507-9511
[2]
K. Romisch, F.W. Miller, B. Dobberstein, S. High.
Human autoantibodies against the 54kDa protein of the signal recognition particle block function at multiple stages.
Arthritis Res Ther, 8 (2006), pp. R39
[3]
P.J. Utz, M. Hottelet, T.M. Le, S.J. Kim, M.E. Geiger, W.J. van Venrooij, et al.
The 72-kDa component of signal recognition particle is cleaved during apoptosis.
J Biol Chem, 273 (1998), pp. 35362-35370
[4]
V.E. Arana-Argáez, V. Delgado-Rizo, O.E. Pizano-Martínez, E.A. Martínez-García, B.T. Martín-Márquez, A. Muñoz-Gómez, et al.
Inhibitors of MAPK pathway ERK1/2 or p38 prevent the IL-1β-induced Up-regulation of SRP72 autoantigen in Jurkat cells.
J Biol Chem, 285 (2010), pp. 32824-32833
[5]
K.L. Randall.
Rituximab in autoimmune diseases.
Aust Prescr, 39 (2016), pp. 131-134
[6]
R. Valiyil, L. Casciola-Rosen, G. Hong, A. Mammen, L. Christopher-Stiner.
Rituximab therapy for myopathy associated with anti-signal recognition particle antibodies: a case series.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 62 (2010), pp. 1328-1334
[7]
I. Pinal-Fernandez, C. Parks, J.L. Werner, J. Akbayda, J. Paik, S.K. Danoff, et al.
Longitudinal course of disease in a large cohort of myositis patients with autoantibodies recognizing the signal recognition particle.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 69 (2017), pp. 263-270
[8]
J.B. Arlet, D. Dimitri, C. Pagnoux, O. Boyer, T. Maisonobe, F.J. Authier, et al.
Marked efficacy of a therapeutic strategy associating prednisone and plasma exchange followed by rituximab in two patients with refractory myopathy associated with antibodies to the signal recognition particle (SRP).
Neuromuscul Disord, 16 (2006), pp. 334-336
[9]
C. Deligny, V. Goeb, M. Dueymes, V. Kahn, V. Dehlinger, G. Jean Baptiste, et al.
Rituximab therapy for myopathy associated with anti-signal recognition particle antibodies: a case series.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 63 (2011), pp. 460
[10]
B.R. Whelan, D.A. Isenberg.
Poor response of anti-SRP-positive idiopathic immune myositis to B-cell depletion.
Rheumatology (Oxford), 48 (2009), pp. 594-595

Please cite this article as: Nóvoa Medina FJ, Gutiérrez Martínez J, González González Y, Romero Díaz B, Machín García S, Rosas Romero A. Tratamiento con rituximab para las miopatías necrosantes autoinmunes asociadas al anti-SRP: caso clínico y revisión de la evidencia. Reumatol Clin. 2018;14:379–381.

Copyright © 2017. Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Reumatología y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología
Idiomas
Reumatología Clínica (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?