was read the article
array:24 [ "pii" => "S2173574314000343" "issn" => "21735743" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reumae.2013.11.009" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2014-07-01" "aid" => "626" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.. All rights reserved" "copyrightAnyo" => "2013" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Reumatol Clin. 2014;10:218-26" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 2322 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 54 "HTML" => 1860 "PDF" => 408 ] ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S1699258X13002222" "issn" => "1699258X" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reuma.2013.11.006" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2014-07-01" "aid" => "626" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L." "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Reumatol Clin. 2014;10:218-26" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 9944 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 165 "HTML" => 8263 "PDF" => 1516 ] ] "es" => array:12 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original</span>" "titulo" => "Documento práctico para el uso de abatacept subcutáneo" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "en" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "218" "paginaFinal" => "226" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Practice guidelines for the use of subcutaneous abatacept" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Emilio Martín Mola, Alejandro Balsa, Víctor Martínez Taboada, José Luis Marenco, Federico Navarro Sarabia, Juan Gómez-Reino, José María Álvaro-Gracia, José Andrés Román Ivorra, Leticia Lojo, Chamaida Plasencia, Loreto Carmona" "autores" => array:11 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Emilio Martín" "apellidos" => "Mola" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Alejandro" "apellidos" => "Balsa" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Víctor" "apellidos" => "Martínez Taboada" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "José Luis" "apellidos" => "Marenco" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Federico" "apellidos" => "Navarro Sarabia" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Juan" "apellidos" => "Gómez-Reino" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "José María" "apellidos" => "Álvaro-Gracia" ] 7 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "José Andrés" "apellidos" => "Román Ivorra" ] 8 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Leticia" "apellidos" => "Lojo" ] 9 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Chamaida" "apellidos" => "Plasencia" ] 10 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Loreto" "apellidos" => "Carmona" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S2173574314000343" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reumae.2013.11.009" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173574314000343?idApp=UINPBA00004M" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1699258X13002222?idApp=UINPBA00004M" "url" => "/1699258X/0000001000000004/v1_201406210040/S1699258X13002222/v1_201406210040/es/main.assets" ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S2173574314000288" "issn" => "21735743" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reumae.2013.10.006" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2014-07-01" "aid" => "619" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L." "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Reumatol Clin. 2014;10:227-40" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 3713 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 57 "HTML" => 3154 "PDF" => 502 ] ] "en" => array:12 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Update of the Mexican College of Rheumatology Guidelines for the Pharmacologic Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "227" "paginaFinal" => "240" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Actualización de la Guía Mexicana para el Tratamiento Farmacológico de la Artritis Reumatoide del Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Mario H. Cardiel, Alejandro Díaz-Borjón, Mónica Vázquez del Mercado Espinosa, Jorge Iván Gámez-Nava, Leonor A. Barile Fabris, César Pacheco Tena, Luis H. Silveira Torre, Virginia Pascual Ramos, María Victoria Goycochea Robles, Jorge Enrique Aguilar Arreola, Verónica González Díaz, José Álvarez Nemegyei, Laura del Carmen González-López, Mario Salazar Páramo, Margarita Portela Hernández, Zully Castro Colín, Daniel Xavier Xibillé Friedman, Everardo Álvarez Hernández, Julio Casasola Vargas, Miguel Cortés Hernández, Diana E. Flores-Alvarado, Laura A. Martínez Martínez, David Vega-Morales, Luis Felipe Flores-Suárez, Gabriel Medrano Ramírez, Antonio Barrera Cruz, Adolfo García González, Susana Marisela López López, Alejandra Rosete Reyes, Rolando Espinosa Morales" "autores" => array:30 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Mario H." "apellidos" => "Cardiel" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Alejandro" "apellidos" => "Díaz-Borjón" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Mónica" "apellidos" => "Vázquez del Mercado Espinosa" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jorge Iván" "apellidos" => "Gámez-Nava" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Leonor A." "apellidos" => "Barile Fabris" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "César" "apellidos" => "Pacheco Tena" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Luis H." "apellidos" => "Silveira Torre" ] 7 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Virginia" "apellidos" => "Pascual Ramos" ] 8 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "María Victoria" "apellidos" => "Goycochea Robles" ] 9 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jorge Enrique" "apellidos" => "Aguilar Arreola" ] 10 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Verónica" "apellidos" => "González Díaz" ] 11 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "José" "apellidos" => "Álvarez Nemegyei" ] 12 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Laura del Carmen" "apellidos" => "González-López" ] 13 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Mario" "apellidos" => "Salazar Páramo" ] 14 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Margarita" "apellidos" => "Portela Hernández" ] 15 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Zully" "apellidos" => "Castro Colín" ] 16 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Daniel Xavier" "apellidos" => "Xibillé Friedman" ] 17 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Everardo" "apellidos" => "Álvarez Hernández" ] 18 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Julio" "apellidos" => "Casasola Vargas" ] 19 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Miguel" "apellidos" => "Cortés Hernández" ] 20 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Diana E." "apellidos" => "Flores-Alvarado" ] 21 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Laura A." "apellidos" => "Martínez Martínez" ] 22 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "David" "apellidos" => "Vega-Morales" ] 23 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Luis Felipe" "apellidos" => "Flores-Suárez" ] 24 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Gabriel" "apellidos" => "Medrano Ramírez" ] 25 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Antonio" "apellidos" => "Barrera Cruz" ] 26 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Adolfo" "apellidos" => "García González" ] 27 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Susana Marisela" "apellidos" => "López López" ] 28 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Alejandra" "apellidos" => "Rosete Reyes" ] 29 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Rolando" "apellidos" => "Espinosa Morales" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S1699258X13002155" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reuma.2013.10.006" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1699258X13002155?idApp=UINPBA00004M" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173574314000288?idApp=UINPBA00004M" "url" => "/21735743/0000001000000004/v1_201406280041/S2173574314000288/v1_201406280041/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S2173574314000513" "issn" => "21735743" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reumae.2014.03.002" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2014-07-01" "aid" => "629" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L." "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Reumatol Clin. 2014;10:210-7" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 3006 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 57 "HTML" => 2473 "PDF" => 476 ] ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Efficiency of Naproxen/Esomeprazole in Association for Osteoarthrosis Treatment in Spain" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "210" "paginaFinal" => "217" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Eficiencia de la combinación naproxeno/esomeprazol para el tratamiento de la artrosis en España" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 1422 "Ancho" => 2167 "Tamanyo" => 236005 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Plot of cost-effectiveness of naproxen/esomeprazole. The cost-effectiveness plane represents the results of the PSA. Each point represents a value of ICER, of each of the 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>000 Monte Carlo simulations performed.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Margarita Capel, Jesús Tornero, José Luis Zamorano, Itziar Oyagüez, Miguel Ángel Casado, Joaquín Sánchez-Covisa, Ángel Lanas" "autores" => array:7 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Margarita" "apellidos" => "Capel" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jesús" "apellidos" => "Tornero" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "José Luis" "apellidos" => "Zamorano" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Itziar" "apellidos" => "Oyagüez" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Miguel Ángel" "apellidos" => "Casado" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Joaquín" "apellidos" => "Sánchez-Covisa" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Ángel" "apellidos" => "Lanas" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S1699258X13002258" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reuma.2013.11.009" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1699258X13002258?idApp=UINPBA00004M" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173574314000513?idApp=UINPBA00004M" "url" => "/21735743/0000001000000004/v1_201406280041/S2173574314000513/v1_201406280041/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:19 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Practice Guidelines for the Use of Subcutaneous Abatacept" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "218" "paginaFinal" => "226" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "Emilio Martín Mola, Alejandro Balsa, Víctor Martínez Taboada, José Luis Marenco, Federico Navarro Sarabia, Juan Gómez-Reino, José María Álvaro-Gracia, José Andrés Román Ivorra, Leticia Lojo, Chamaida Plasencia, Loreto Carmona" "autores" => array:11 [ 0 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "Emilio Martín" "apellidos" => "Mola" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "emartinmola.hulp@salud.madrid.org" ] "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">¿</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Alejandro" "apellidos" => "Balsa" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Víctor" "apellidos" => "Martínez Taboada" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "José Luis" "apellidos" => "Marenco" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Federico" "apellidos" => "Navarro Sarabia" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">d</span>" "identificador" => "aff0020" ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Juan" "apellidos" => "Gómez-Reino" "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">e</span>" "identificador" => "aff0025" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">f</span>" "identificador" => "aff0030" ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "José María" "apellidos" => "Álvaro-Gracia" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">g</span>" "identificador" => "aff0035" ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "José Andrés" "apellidos" => "Román Ivorra" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">h</span>" "identificador" => "aff0040" ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Leticia" "apellidos" => "Lojo" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Chamaida" "apellidos" => "Plasencia" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Loreto" "apellidos" => "Carmona" "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">e</span>" "identificador" => "aff0025" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">i</span>" "identificador" => "aff0045" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:9 [ 0 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain" "etiqueta" => "a" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain" "etiqueta" => "b" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 2 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain" "etiqueta" => "c" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] 3 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain" "etiqueta" => "d" "identificador" => "aff0020" ] 4 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain" "etiqueta" => "e" "identificador" => "aff0025" ] 5 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain" "etiqueta" => "f" "identificador" => "aff0030" ] 6 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, IIS Princesa, Madrid, Spain" "etiqueta" => "g" "identificador" => "aff0035" ] 7 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain" "etiqueta" => "h" "identificador" => "aff0040" ] 8 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Instituto de Salud Musculoesquelética, Madrid, Spain" "etiqueta" => "i" "identificador" => "aff0045" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Documento práctico para el uso de abatacept subcutáneo" ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The efficacy and safety of a biological agent are key elements when it comes to their selection for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but other factors also play an important role, including the route of administration. Many patients prefer the autonomy the ability to inject the drug subcutaneously (SC) provides versus having to go to a day hospital or intravenous infusion (IV) unit. A significant number of doctors prefer the SC route, considering its efficacy and safety, due to, among other factors, the fact is that it has less organizational complexities. Hence the interest in developing SC administrable formulations for drugs available for IV use still persists.</p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The change of the IV administration route for the SC one in the case of a protein derived drug is not a matter of simple substitution at all. SC administration poses significant differences compared to IV, both from the point of view of efficacy and safety, requiring studies and independent development. Some aspects are particularly relevant. The first is the dosage, as the SC route carries pharmacokinetic differences that result in different patterns of administration, dosages and different intervals than IV. Another key aspect is immunogenicity. Parenteral administration of proteinaceous drugs is associated, at least theoretically, with the possibility of developing antibodies against the drug (ADA). The route of administration and the dosage are factors that may influence this phenomenon, because, among other things, differences in antigen presentation<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a>; in addition, the different composition of the excipients for both formulations may also contribute to differences in immunogenicity and hence the enormous importance of analyzing the immunogenicity in the process of developing an IV biologic drug for SC administration. In addition, factors such as drug temporary interruption and subsequent reintroduction, the change in the same patient from IV to SC of the use of the drug alone or association with disease modifying drugs (DMARDs), may modify the immunogenic properties of a protein product.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> Another safety aspect that deserves special analysis is the possible occurrence of reactions at the site of SC injection.</p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Abatacept is a selective proteinaceous biological modulator of T cell costimulation, approved for treatment of RA. IV use has demonstrated efficacy with an adequate safety profile in different populations of patients with this disease, including patients who had never previously received methotrexate (MTX), patients with inadequate response to synthetic disease-modifying drugs (DMARDs) and anti-TNF biological.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3–5</span></a></p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In addition to the IV formulation, in recent years a new way to use abatacept has been developed subcutaneously. <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a> shows the summary of the major clinical trials. The ACQUIRE study is the main trial, with a larger number of patients, which compared, from the point of view of efficacy and safety, compared SC to IV administration of abatacept.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> The ALLOW study specifically analyzes the possible impact on immunogenicity of the suspension and subsequent drug reintroduction.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> The ATTUNE trial studied the effect of replacing IV abatacept administration with SC in patients who previously had been receiving IV.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> In the ACCOMPANY trial, the effect of SC administration of abatacept in monotherapy versus combination with MTX is investigated mainly from the standpoint of immunogenicity.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0045"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> In the AMPLE study, the efficacy and safety of two biologic drugs, abatacept and adalimumab are compared in combination with MTX.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0050"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a></p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Abatacept for SC use is presented in prefilled glass syringes with 125<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg of active ingredient in 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ml volume. The SC formula contains no maltose, unlike the IV form 11. Phase I and phase II studies have concluded that a weekly dose of 125<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg SC provides therapeutic levels of abatacept.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0060"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">12</span></a></p><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The availability of a new formulation of abatacept for SC use expands options for the treatment of RA. The objective of this paper is to review the clinical evidence on SC abatacept and discuss potential benefits that its use may incur.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Methods</span><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The document was based on a meeting in which the available evidence on SC abatacept was discussed and decisions about the issues that were most important for clinical practice were taken. Each panelist carried out a review of the relevant item that was assigned based on searches in PubMed, ACR and EULAR meetings and drug inserts. The final document was agreed upon by all the panelists. The level of evidence was graduated with the Oxford scale.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0065"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Results</span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Pharmacokinetics</span><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Several studies have shown that the trough concentration at steady state of abatacept provides optimal inhibition of T cells and thus leads to an adequate clinical response is ≥10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>μg/ml.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0070"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a> These concentrations are achieved with the approved IV abatacept dose and in 90% of patients treated with SC abatacept.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0055"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11</span></a> To demonstrate the efficacy and safety of SC abatacept compared to the classical IV form used so far, studies in animals<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0075"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15,16</span></a> and humans have been performed.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,11,17,18</span></a> To this end, clinical trials were designed with and without an IV loading dose where the impact of the dose on clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of abatacept SC was evaluated. In clinical trials of SC abatacept (including the essential ACQUIRE) an IV loading dose of abatacept is included on day one to rapidly achieve therapeutic concentrations and then compare whether the efficiency of the SC administration is similar to the IV administration.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,11,17,18</span></a> In these studies, a similar profile regarding efficacy and safety for the 2 routes of administration is demonstrated, and the vast majority of patients receiving SC abatacept reach a stable concentration of abatacept in the valley <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">μ</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>≥<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/mL, with less variation between peak and trough concentration than with IV administration.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0090"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18</span></a></p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Although with some reservations, due to the different study designs (ALLOW and ACCOMPANY), we can deduce that the clinical efficacy of SC abatacept, followed or not by an IV loading dose, is similar at 3 months of starting treatment, with abatacept attaining therapeutic levels at 2 weeks in the majority of patients (88%) in which no loading dose was used.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0085"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17,19</span></a> Thus, in those patients who are scheduled to start SC abatacept, it does not seem necessary to administer a loading dose (LE 2b).</p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Several studies have determined the level of abatacept in serum, and the presence of antiabatacept antibodies by ELISA, showing that SC abatacept is well tolerated and has a safety profile similar to IV abatacept regarding immunogenicity.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,9,11,20</span></a> It has been similarly shown, in healthy volunteers, that both IV administration and SC abatacept produce a similar receptor occupancy (75%) (information provided by Bristol–Myers Squibb).</p><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">SC abatacept exhibits linear pharmacokinetics and has fewer variations in the valley than IV administration.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0060"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">12</span></a> The bioavailability of SC administration compared to IV administration is 78.6%.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0090"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18</span></a> The estimated systemic clearance (0.28<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mL/(h<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>kg)), volume of distribution (0.11<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>L/kg) and elimination half-life (14.3 days) media are comparable between SC and the IV administration. As occurs intravenously, the pharmacokinetics analysis showed that with the SC form, drug clearance increases with increasing weight. Age-and sex–adjusted for body weight–did not affect drug clearance. Concomitant medications such as MTX, corticosteroids and NSAIDs, apparently do not influence abatacept clearance<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0060"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">12,21</span></a> (LE 2b).</p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Efficacy</span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Efficacy in the Short and Long Term (Level of Evidence 1b)</span><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The clinical development of SC abatacept is based on a phase II study of safety and 4 dose-finding phase III studies (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>).</p><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The ACQUIRE study<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> compared the efficacy of 24 weeks of abatacept 150<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg SC weekly versus traditional IV administration. The study included 1457 patients with active RA despite treatment with MTX. The SC group received one IV loading dose on day one. Some patients with a biological DMARD failure (3.3% in the SC and 4.5% in the IV group) were allowed for inclusion. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of the SC formulation against IV by ACR20 at 24 weeks. The characteristics of the patients were similar in both groups and showed significant clinical activity, since patients would be required to have a number of painful joints and swollen over 10 and a DAS28 exceeding 6 in both groups. The primary endpoint showed no significant differences, since the SC abatacept group had an ACR20 response of 76% and IV treated patients, 75.8%. Other secondary objectives, such as ACR50 and 70, were similar. There were no differences when stratifying patients by weight. Disability measured using the <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Health Assessment Questionnaire</span> (HAQ) improved in both groups. HAQ response was seen in 68.2% versus 63.8% in SC and IV patients, respectively. The reduction in DAS28 was similar in both groups: 2.57 (SC) and 2.55 (IV). In both groups, similar percentages of patients with low activity were seen at 6 months (DAS28<span class="elsevierStyleMonospace"><</span>3.2: 39.5 SC and 41.3 IV) and remission: 24.2 and 24.8 for SC and IV, respectively. There were also no differences in patient assessment of pain and disease activity.</p></span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0095">Comparison of ACQUIRE With AIM</span><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Data from the open-label extension of the AIM and ACQUIRE<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0020"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a> trials<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> serve as comparison of IV and SC abatacept administration.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22</span></a> The analysis included 1372 patients from ACQUIRE, 378 from AIM in its open-label extension phase. The patients in both studies had high rates of activity, with swollen joint count at baseline 31 for AIM and 29.6 in ACQUIRE and DAS28 of 6.4 and 6.2, respectively. For comparison of both treatment group, the beginning of the days until the last visit was considered as 253, on day 897. The values of ACR20, 50, and 70 were similar in both studies, both at baseline and at the end of follow-up. An ACR20 efficacy of 81.8% and 80.1% at the start of the IV and SC groups, which remained to the end of the period of observation period (83.6% and 83.4%) was observed. The behavior was similar in the case of ACR50, 50.8% (IV) and 54.9% (SC) at the start of the comparison and 58.6% (IV) and 59.9% (SC) at the end. The ACR70 was 27.1% compared with 32% and 34.7% and 38.1% for IV and SC treatment at the beginning and end of treatment, respectively. The disease activity dropped to DAS 2.72 (IV) and 3.01 (SC) from baseline at the start of the comparison in ACQUIRE, with virtually identical values in AIM. The percentage of patients with low activity measured by DAS28 <3.2 and remission <2.6 was similar in both treatment groups. The low activity in AIM went from 40% at baseline to 50.2% at the end and a remission rate of 20.5 and 29.7. In ACQUIRE, there was low activity in 44% and 53.8%, remission in 27.3% at baseline and 35% at the end. In short, the results of SC abatacept are similar to those obtained with IV after comparing patients included in the AIM study, with similar populations, patients with very active disease, refractory to MTX. The degree of improvement and the percentages of ACR improvement and patients in remission or low activity were maintained during the observation period for two and a half years.</p></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0100">Loading Dose (Level of Evidence 1b)</span><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Some studies included an IV loading dose to rapidly achieve therapeutic concentrations of the drug. At the start of the ALLOW open trial, 167 patients received abatacept SC with an initial IV loading dose (about 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/kg body weight). In the long-term extension of ACCOMPANY, patients were stratified to SC abatacept, 125<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg weekly without initial loading dose. In both studies, patients were refractory to DMARD or biologicals and similar in other demographics, although the severity of the disease was lower in patients who received an IV loading dose compared to than those who did not.</p><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A total of 167 patients participated in ALLOW, receiving SC abatacept plus an IV initial loading dose and 100 patients entered the ACCOMPANY study and received SC abatacept with or without MTX, without a loading dose. Improvements in DAS28 and HAQ were similar in both groups with or without the IV loading dose (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a>). Although the data should be used with caution by people with different baseline severity, the magnitude of improvement was similar in both studies, regardless of whether an initial IV loading dose was administered.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">23</span></a></p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The pharmacokinetic data obtained in these studies (discussed at length in this paper) also indicate that the IV loading dose is not necessary, since SC abatacept reaches therapeutic concentrations by the time of the second weekly dose.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0085"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0105">Fixed Subcutaneous Dose of Abatacept Regardless of Weight (Level of Evidence 1b)</span><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Both the study of multiple dose phase II<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0055"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11</span></a> trial of weight-dependent compared with fixed doses of 125<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg weekly of abatacept, as in ACQUIRE,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> pharmacokinetic results showed that a weekly dose of 125<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg of SC abatacept provided serum concentrations within the therapeutic range, regardless of patient weight.</p><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the ACQUIRE trial, patients with active RA, stratified by body weight (<60<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>kg<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>, 60–100<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>kg, >100<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>kg) were randomized to receive abatacept IV 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/kg body weight every 4 weeks or SC abatacept 125<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg. The SC abatacept group received, on day 1, an IV infusion (10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/kg) 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h before the first SC dose. Pharmacokinetic and immunogenic studies showed that a fixed dose of 125<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/week were well tolerated, did not induce immunogenicity against CTLA-4 and produced concentrations within the therapeutic range. The effectiveness, measured as ACR20/50/70 response, DAS28, low disease activity and remission was similar in the IV and SC abatacept groups. Subgroup analysis according to body weight did not show differences in the ACR20 response that depended on the route of administration.</p></span><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0110">Replacing IV Abatacept With SC Abatacept (Level of Evidence 2b)</span><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the ATTUNE study,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> an open single treatment arm trial, 71 patients from the AIM extension study (abatacept in patients with failure to MTX<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0020"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a>) and 52 from ATTAIN (abatacept in patients with anti-TNF failure<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0025"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a>) were included in a 12-week study extended to a year, to assess the safety of changing the formulation of abatacept from IV to SC (both in combination with MTX). The percentage of patients with baseline remission or low disease activity remained stable and physical function was assessed by HAQ during the study period and at one year follow up. This occurred in all patients and when both populations, AIMs and ATTAINs, were analyzed separately.</p></span><span id="sec0055" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0115">Efficacy After Stopping and Restarting Treatment (Level of Evidence 2b)</span><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the ALLOW study,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> 167 patients were treated with SC abatacept<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX. Of these, 120 patients had reduction in DAS28 greater than 0.6 at 12 weeks and were randomized to continue SC abatacept<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX or placebo<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX until week 24. At the end of this period, all patients entered an extension study of treatment with SC abatacept along with 37 patients who had no response at week 12. The reintroduction of abatacept in the group of patients who had temporarily suspended recovered the efficacy rate and induced a clinical response of the same magnitude as the abatacept group that remained with uninterrupted treatment.</p></span><span id="sec0060" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0120">Monotherapy (Level of Evidence 2b)</span><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In a 4-month study, a group of 100 patients were stratified to receive SC abatacept<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (n=51) or SC abatacept monotherapy (n=49). Of these, 50 and 46, respectively, entered the extension study. Both treatment groups were similar, except that the monotherapy group had higher activity than the combination group (baseline DAS28 5.6 vs 5.0). After 4 months, 55.3% (SC abatacept<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX) and 44.2% (abatacept monotherapy) patients had low disease activity. At the end of an observation period of 18 months, this situation was present in 57.5% of the combined group and 69.4% in the monotherapy arm. After 4 months, the DAS28 remission occurred in 29.8% of the combined-therapy group and 32.6% of those who received monotherapy. In the extension phase at 18 months, remission rates of 42.5% (combination therapy) and 58.3% (monotherapy) were attained. Dropout rates were also equivalents.</p></span><span id="sec0065" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0125">Functional Capacity (Level of Evidence 2b)</span><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">SC abatacept improves the functional capacity of RA patients equally than IV Abatacept. Functional capacity improvement is also maintained when patients receive SC abatacept after a period of withdrawal, or they receive it as a continuation of IV abatacept IV. Variations in physical function were also measured by HAQ with SC abatacept evaluated against IV abatacept in patients with inadequate response to MTX (ACQUIRE study),<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> in adults with active RA (ALLOW study)<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> and in patients switching treatment from IV to SC (ATTUNE study).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a></p><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The percentage of patients achieving an improvement in the HAQ in the ACQUIRE trial was 68.2% (95% CI [95% CI], 64.8–71.6) and 63.8% (95% CI, 60.3–67.3) for SC and IV abatacept groups, respectively (estimate of difference [4.5%, 95% CI, −0.4 to 9.4]). The change in adjusted mean<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>standard deviation from baseline to month 6 for SC abatacept was 0.69<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.02 and 0.70<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.02 for IV abatacept. The primary endpoint, non-inferiority of SC abatacept versus IV abatacept, based on ACR20 responses at 6 months was fulfilled.</p><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the ALLOW trial, the primary endpoint (immunogenicity) was fulfilled. Efficacy assessments were secondary objectives. At the end of the period I<span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">,</span> all patients had similar reductions in the DAS28 score. The mean reductions in HAQ for patients who remained in the SC abatacept group were: in period I −0.74 (95% CI, −0.91 to −0.57) in period II −0.72 (95% CI, −0.95 to −0.50) and −0.86 in period III (95% CI, −1.04 to −0.67). For patients who suspended SC abatacept during period II<span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">,</span> the mean reductions in HAQ were, in period I −0.63 (95% CI, −0.76 to −0.49), in period II of −0.50 (95% CI, −0.63 to −0.37) and −0.72 in period III (95% CI,<span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">−</span>0.85 to 0.60<span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">).</span></p><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The main objective of the ATTUNE study was to evaluate the safety of SC abatacept during the first 3 months after switching from IV abatacept. Changing from IV to SC abatacept was well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that observed during treatment with long-term IV abatacept in ATTAIN and AIM.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0020"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4,5</span></a> At baseline, the mean<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SD HAQ for patients with an inadequate response to MTX (n=71) was 0.91 (0.68) and for patients with inadequate response to anti-TNF (n=52) was 0.98 (0.71). The mean HAQ, based on an analysis as observed for patients with inadequate response to MTX at month 3 (n=71) was 0.82<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.69, and at month 12 (n=69) was 0.86<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.70. For patients with an inadequate response to anti-TNF, HAQ at 3 months (n=49) was 0.92<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.67, and at month 12 (n=45) was 0.97<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.66. It can be concluded that abatacept SC maintains the improvement in the HAQ previously obtained with IV abatacept.</p></span><span id="sec0070" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0130">Comparison With Adalimumab and Radiological Progression (Level of Evidence 1b)</span><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Inhibition of radiographic progression with SC abatacept was evaluated in the AMPLE trial.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0050"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> This study conducted a comparison of SC abatacept versus adalimumab in patients, both with standard doses, with inadequate response to MTX. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority in the ACR20 at 12 months of treatment, resulting in a clinical response and similar kinetics with both drugs. An abstract presented at the last ACR congress (Washington, 2012) also showed that other secondary variables, such as pain, HAQ and the various components of the SF36,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">24</span></a> reached similar values. In addition, an important secondary outcome measure was the absence of radiographic progression assessed using the van der Heijde modified total Sharp Score (MTSS). Matched radiographic images were available at one year for 1290 and 289 patients in the abatacept and adalimumab groups, respectively. In both treatment groups, a similar inhibition of radiographic damage is observed. After one year, the mean changes from baseline in the abatacept<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX and adalimumab<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX groups were: total score, 0.58 and 0.38, erosion score, 0.29 and −0.01, and narrowing of the joint space, 0.28 and 0.39, respectively. The rate of absence of radiographic progression (defined as the smallest detectable change ≤2.8) was observed in 84.8% and 88.6% of patients in the abatacept<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX and the adalimumab<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX groups, respectively. In conclusion, it can be said that SC abatacept is similar in efficacy to adalimumab for inhibition of radiographic progression in RA.</p></span><span id="sec0075" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0135">Immunogenicity (Level of Evidence 2a)</span><p id="par0140" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">All processed proteins, as biological agents, have the potential to develop an immune response, but their structure is one of the most important factors that determine the appearance of immunogenicity.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">25</span></a> Chimeric antibodies, such as infliximab, due to its murine part, are the most frequently associated to anti-drug antibodies, while protein compounds formed from the extracellular portion of a receptor coupled to an immunoglobulin are the least immunogenic, as is the case of etanercept and abatacept.</p><p id="par0145" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Abatacept is a fully human recombinant protein, comprising the extracellular domain of the CTLA4 molecule and a fragment of the Fc portion of human IgG1, with just a difference of four amino acids in the connection or hinge region, genetically modified to reduce binding to Fc receptors and prevent complement activation; except the binding region or hinge protein, it is fully human and needs not be recognized as foreign by the immune system. Additionally, it has also been proposed that abatacept can reduce ADA formation due to its mechanism of action.</p><p id="par0150" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The clinical consequences of immunogenicity depends on the intensity of the immune reaction and the affinity for the ligand and may range from no clinical consequence, if the amount of antibody is small and of low affinity, to a significant alteration in the drugs pharmacokinetics, efficacy or safety. Non-neutralizing anti-drug antibody formation leads to small immune complexes, which are slowly removed by the liver and spleen, but, theoretically, the drug still retains the ability to bind to the ligand and therefore does not completely lose its effectiveness. The formation of neutralizing antibodies will prevent the drug from binding to its therapeutic target, so its clinical efficacy will be directly affected. In the case of abatacept, for example, there is a theoretical risk for the development of neutralizing antibodies that can react with the endogenous CTLA4 molecule expressed on the T lymphocytes, neutralizing the activity of the endogenous protein and lead to an immunostimulatory state, which potentially may worsen the underlying disease or help develop new autoimmune diseases.</p><p id="par0155" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">One of the most important aspects of immunogenicity is the development of methodology to determine it, and because there is still no standardization of methods, the results can not be compared or contrasted.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">25</span></a> At present, there is only abatacept immunogenicity data reported by Bristol–Myers Squibb and no independent groups has studied it. It is important to note that, often, the data provided by the companies in the registration studies and data arising in clinical practice are dissimilar, primarily due to patient selection, different methodologies and longer follow-up all patients in observational studies, whereas in the extension studies only those continuing earn the benefit of treatment, which are probably those who are not developing anti-drug antibodies.</p><p id="par0160" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Two methods were used to study the immunogenicity of SC abatacept, based on the first tests used in the studies of IV abatacept, with some improvements that increase sensitivity. Initially, we developed an ELISA directed against the entire abatacept molecule, but to avoid false positives and the signal produced by the presence of rheumatoid factor and nonspecific anti-Fc antibodies, a more specific assay was developed using only the portion of the CTLA4 molecule used as a positive control and a pool of polyclonal antiabatacept antibodies obtained by inoculating a monkey.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">26</span></a> All ELISA are exposed to results interfered with by the presence of free drug, which can not detect anti-drug antibodies.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0135"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27</span></a> To minimize this, all samples were collected just before administration of the next dose and have also been studied in patients who had skipped some infusions or after the treatment period.</p><p id="par0165" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The second method is based on another ELISA, called <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">electroluminiscence</span> (ELS), and has proven to be more sensitive and therefore does not suffer interference from circulating drug levels. Samples are first treated with acid to dissociate immune complexes and to minimize the effects of other nonspecific antibodies. This assay can detect antibodies against all regions of abatacept.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> All positive sera with anti-CTLA4 antibody in ESL and ELISA were studied to identify the presence of neutralizing antibodies through a bioassay for determining whether the serum of patients with anti-drug antibodies is capable of inhibiting the immunosuppressive effect of abatacept in lymphocyte culture (LE 5).</p><p id="par0170" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The results of immunogenicity studies with IV abatacept, both during blinded treatment as long-term extension, overall show very low immunogenicity. From a total of 2237 patients studied, 62 (2.8%) demonstrated anti-abatacept or CTLA4 antibodies. Using ESL, the figure increased to 3% and no protective effect of MTX (2.3% with MTX vs 1.4% without MTX) was demonstrated. Patients who discontinued treatment had slightly higher frequencies of anti-drug antibodies than those who continued treatment (7.4% vs 2.6%) and only 8 of 13 patients studied showed neutralizing activity. No clinical relevance was demonstrated in terms of loss of efficacy, a need to increase the dose, side effects or increased development of autoimmune diseases.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">26</span></a></p><p id="par0175" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Development of SC abatacept should achieve efficacy and safety results similar to those of the IV route, with similar immunogenicity levels, taking into account that the SC route of administration is more immunogenic than IV when forming aggregates at the injection site, process antigens differently and more efficiently and transports most of the volume administered by the lymphatic route to the bloodstream.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> The study was based on four general principles, a study comparing the two routes of administration, another after the suspension and the reintroduction of the drug, one that investigates the relationship with concomitant medication with MTX and finally the development of immunogenicity in patients moving from IV to SC route.</p><p id="par0180" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the ACQUIRE study, few patients who developed antiabatacept antibodies or tested positive for them in the anti-CTLA4 trial, which failed to demonstrate any effect on the efficacy or safety in these patients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> These results support the fact that immunogenicity is not increased when the SC route is used compared to IV. In a similar study in Japan,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0140"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a> after 6 months of treatment no anti-drug antibodies were observed in any of the 59 SC patients versus one of 59 with IV treatment.</p><p id="par0185" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I the ALLOW<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> study, the effect of drug suspension and rechallenge on immunogenicity in patients receiving MTX was investigated. In the first 3 months, all patients were treated with SC abatacept openly and end of the period, 2 (1.7%) of 118 patients developed anti-drug antibodies. In the open period, none of the patients who continued treatment developed immunogenicity while the other developed seven (9.6%) among the 73 who had stopped the drug for 3 months. In phase III of rechallenge, anti-drug antibodies were demonstrated in 1 (2.6%) of the 38 patients who remained on treatment throughout the period and in 2 (2.7%) of 73 patients who reintroduced treatment. These results may be due to a direct effect of the drug inhibiting the development of anti-drug antibodies during the administration or loss of interference of ELISA in the presence of the drug. Whatever the reasons, it is confirmed, as in the IV development, that the frequency of immunogenicity after discontinuing the drug and reintroducing it is very low.</p><p id="par0190" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In ACCOMPANY, the effect of concomitant treatment with MTX on immunogenicity was investigated when not using an IV loading dose.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0145"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a> At 4 months of treatment, 3 (6.2%) of 48 patients receiving combination therapy showed anti-drug antibodies versus 2 (4.2%) of 47 in monotherapy. In the extension period, which reached 16 months, ADA were demonstrated in one (2.1%) patient treated in combination versus 0 in monotherapy. No effects were demonstrated in efficacy or safety.</p><p id="par0195" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Finally, in the ATTUNE trial<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> investigating the development of immunogenicity in patients switching from IV treatment from AIM and ATTAIN to SC treatment, at 3 months of SC treatment, anti-drug antibodies were demonstrated in 8 (6.6%) of 122 patients in the ELISA while only 1 (0.8%) of the 122 patients were detected using the ESL assay, confirming the very low rates of immunogenicity of SC abatacept (LE 2b).</p></span></span><span id="sec0080" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0140">Safety</span><p id="par0200" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The administration of a SC or IV biologic drug may be accompanied by differences in immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics. These differences may reflect individual differences in safety. The “a priori” assumption that the two administration forms will have a similar safety profile may be wrong. Therefore, the comparison is essential (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0015">Table 3</a>).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0015"></elsevierMultimedia><span id="sec0085" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0145">Serious Adverse Events (Level of Evidence 2a)</span><p id="par0205" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the pooled safety analysis of<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a> Phase II trials for dose-finding, ACCOMPANY<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0045"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> ACQUIRE 6, ALLLOW<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> and ATTUNE<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> with an exhibition of 4214 patient-years for 1879 patients, the incidence rates of adverse events serious per 100 patient-years for SC abatacept were 9.25 (95% CI, 7.46–11.48), 10.75 (95% CI, 8.72–13.24), 8.21 (95% CI, 6.29–10.72) and 8.85 (95% CI, 6.26–12.51) in the 0–6, 6–12, 12–18, and 18–24 month periods. In the<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">31</span></a> AMPLE trial at one year, 1.3% of patients treated with SC abatacept<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX and 3.0% of patients treated with SC adalimumab<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX discontinued medication for serious adverse events.</p><p id="par0210" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the ACQUIRE trial,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> SC abatacept and IV abatacept percentages of suspension for serious adverse events was 1.1% and 1.9%, respectively. In the ACCOMPANY<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0045"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> trial at 4 months, these rates were 5.9% for SC abatacept<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX and 2.0% for SC abatacept monotherapy. In the ATTUNE<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> trial, suspension rates for serious adverse events were 0.8% at 3 months and 3.3% in the accumulated period. These percentages were higher in patients who had previously failed TNF antagonists.</p></span><span id="sec0090" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0150">Serious Infections</span><p id="par0215" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the pooled safety analysis,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a> incidence rates per 100 patient-years of serious infections for SC abatacept in periods of 0–6, 6–12, 12–18, and 18–24 months were 2.42 (95% CI, 1.60–3.68), 2.12 (95% CI, 1.33–3.36), 1.28 (95% CI, 0.66–2.46) and 1.51 (95% CI, 0.68–3.36). Pneumonia and urinary tract infections were the most frequent serious infections. Perhaps these figures are somewhat lower than those reported in clinical trials with other biologics. These incidents show that the risk of serious infection does not increase over time. In the<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">31</span></a> AMPLE trial at one year, 2.2% of patients treated with SC abatacept<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX and 2.7% of patients treated with SC adalimumab<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX had a serious infection.</p></span><span id="sec0095" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0155">Injection Site Skin Reactions</span><p id="par0220" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the pooled safety analysis,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a> 3% of patients treated with SC abatacept developed some skin reaction at the injection site. The rate of adverse events per 100 patient-years was 2.2. These percentages are somewhat lower than for etanercept (6.5% at 3 months and 10% per year) and adalimumab (19.5%–26.1% at 1 year).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">32–34</span></a> For the 0–6, 6–12, 12–18, and 18–24 months periods of exposure, the incidence rates per 100 patient-years for skin reaction at the injection site were 5.59 (95% CI, 4.24–7.38), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.32–1.59), 1.40 (95% CI, 0.77–1.59) and 0.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a> In the AMPLE one year trial, 3.2% of patients treated with SC abatacept<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX developed some kind of skin reaction at the injection site compared with 9.1% of patients treated with SC adalimumab<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX.</p><p id="par0225" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the ACQUIRE<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> trial at 6 months, 2.6% of patients in the group of patients treated with SC abatacept had some kind of skin reaction at the injection site compared with 2.5% in the IV group treated with abatacept. The most common reactions in the SC abatacept group were pruritus and erythema. In the ACCOMPANY<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0045"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> trial at 4 months, 5.9% of patients treated with SC abatacept<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX developed cutaneous reactions at the site of injection compared to 8.2% of patients treated with SC abatacept. Systemic reactions 24<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h after the injection appeared in 7.8% of patients treated with combination therapy and 8.2% of patients treated with abatacept monotherapy.</p></span><span id="sec0100" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0160">Autoimmune Events</span><p id="par0230" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the pooled safety analysis,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a> the rate of autoimmune events per 100 patient-years was 1.28 (95% CI, 0.9–1.75) in patients treated with SC abatacept and 1.99 (95% CI, 1.74–2.26) in patients treated with IV abatacept. Incidence rates for SC abatacept in the 0–6, 6–12, 12–18, and 18–24 month periods were 1.54 (95% CI, 0.91–2.60), 0.94 (95% CI, 0.47–1.88), 0 1.5 (95% CI, 0.85–2.63) and 2.00 (95% CI, 1.20–3.31). The AMPLE one year trial showed that 3.1% of patients treated SC abatacept<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX developed some type of autoimmune event compared with 1.2% of patients treated with SC adalimumab<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX.</p><p id="par0235" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the ACQUIRE<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> trial, 1% of patients treated with SC abatacept<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX and 0.8% of patients treated with IV abatacept<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX, respectively, developed autoimmune events. In ACCOMPANY<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0045"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> trial at 4 months, none of the patients developed autoimmune events. In the ATTUNE<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> trial, in the cumulative period, 1.6% of patients developed autoimmune events.</p></span><span id="sec0105" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0165">Tumors</span><p id="par0240" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the pooled safety analysis,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a> incidence rates per 100 patient-years for malignant tumors with SC abatacept in periods 0–6, 6–12, 12–18, and 18–24 months were 0.33 (95% CI, 0.11–1.02), 1.05 (95% CI, 0.55–2.01), 0.37 (95% CI, 0.12–1.14) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.27–1.57). In the<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">31</span></a> AMPLE trial at one year, 1.6% of patients treated with SC abatacept<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX developed some kind of tumor compared with 1.2% of patients treated with SC adalimumab<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX.</p><p id="par0245" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the ACQUIRE<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> trial at 6 months, 0.4% of patients in the group of patients treated with SC abatacept had a malignant or benign tumor compared with 0.7% in the IV abatacept group. The most common reactions in the SC abatacept group were pruritus and erythema. In the accumulated period of the ATTUNE<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> trial, 1.6% of patients developed a tumor.</p><p id="par0250" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In conclusion, the safety profile in clinical trials with SC abatacept is similar to IV abatacept. Keep in mind that exposure in these trials is still short-term and it is necessary that this profile is complete with information that will come from observational studies generated by registries.</p></span></span></span><span id="sec0110" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0170">Discussion</span><p id="par0255" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Treatment with biologic therapies allow for 2 routes of administration, IV and SC. Each has its advantages and disadvantages, although there is no doubt that the SC route gives patients a much higher degree of autonomy compared to IV and exempts them from visiting the day hospital.</p><p id="par0260" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In this article, the efficacy and safety of SC abatacept, a biological agent that was approved for use in Spain IV 5 years ago, are reviewed. Abatacept is, to date, the only biological agent that allows both IV and SC administration, which is an added advantage for the patient, since at any given time one way may be more suitable for administration than the other.</p><p id="par0265" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">However, the development of a drug by another route, SC in this case, than originally approved requires a virtually complete clinical development, as a different form of administration adopted initially means evaluating pharmacokinetics, determining the dose and scheduling for more appropriate management and finally demonstrating a degree of safety and efficacy that is at least similar to the administration route initially approved. Another added fact is immunogenicity. It has been shown that the development of anti-drug antibodies has a negative impact on drug efficacy.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">25,27</span></a> On the other hand, SC administration, by its nature, explained earlier in this article, is more likely to produce immunogenicity.</p><p id="par0270" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Apart from trials in phase <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">II,</span> in which the ideal dose and safety<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0055"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11</span></a> is determined, perhaps the most relevant study was ACQUIRE,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> which showed that 24 weeks of abatacept SC at the dose of 125<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg weekly was not inferior than IV administration at the usual dose. All evaluated outcome measures were similar, with the main objective being ACR20, which obtained a response rate of 76% and 75.8% in the IV and SC groups, respectively. However, it should be noted that patients treated SC received an IV loading dose prior to the SC administration. Patients were openly followed receiving abatacept SC and compared with those of the AIM trial, IV<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22</span></a> abatacept study, which by design and features allowed comparing two populations with different routes of administration. While caution must be maintained when comparing populations of different trials, monitoring of both populations showed no differences between the main measures of rated activity.</p><p id="par0275" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Other topics discussed were whether or not to administer a loading IV dose prior to SC administration. In ACCOMPANY and ALLOW, the effectiveness of SC abatacept with and without a loading dose, respectively (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a>), found no differences in the response. Again, and as discussed above, the results should be taken with caution, coming from different studies, however, no pharmacokinetic data supported using a loading dose.</p><p id="par0280" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Another fact that has attracted interest is whether the dose would depend on the patient's weight. The ACQUIRE study showed no difference in ACR20 response according to patient weight. Likewise SC use of abatacept in patients previously treated with IV formulations produced no loss of efficacy or increased adverse events.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> Another interesting development in the clinical aspect SC abatacept was to assess whether treatment discontinuation and subsequent restart would mean a loss of efficacy. The answer was that patients who had been treated for several weeks with placebo plus MTX, having previously received abatacept SC, lost efficiency, but recovered it with a response of equal intensity to that obtained when they were receiving the active drug.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> Another study indicated that SC administration of abatacept monotherapy may be a therapeutic option for patients who can not tolerate MTX.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0100"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20</span></a> Finally, other studies<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8,23,28</span></a> have shown that abatacept SC has an identical capacity to its IV counterpart to produce an improvement in function as measured by HAQ.</p><p id="par0285" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">One of the most interesting studies with abatacept SC has been conducted in a direct comparison with adalimumab.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0050"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> The study was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority in the ACR20 at one year of treatment with both drugs and also other, both clinical and radiological, secondary endpoints were studied. Abatacept was not shown to be inferior in efficacy or other secondary parameters measuring other activity or disability components. But, perhaps most importantly, was the fact that SC abatacept was found to be a drug with the same ability to prevent radiological progression than adalimumab. IV Abatacept has always been considered as a drug with less ability to slow structural damage compared with anti-TNF as a whole.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">35</span></a> If this new situation is due to the new formulation is or, conversely, the extrapolation of data done with IV abatacept led to conclusions which were not entirely accurate is a question that has no answer, but what is beyond doubt is that to speak emphatically of varying efficacy, or other outcome measures, the strongest proof is a direct comparison between drugs and not obtaining data through indirect means.</p><p id="par0290" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">With regard to other aspects of interest, abatacept SC behaves like a scarcely immunogenic drug. Virtually in all studies of this new formulation (ACQUIRE, ALLOW, attune and ACCOMPANY), anti-drug antibody rates show no or merely symbolic rates and had no impact on the efficacy or safety of the patient.</p><p id="par0295" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Finally, in terms of safety concerns, and relating specifically to serious adverse events, different clinical studies have not demonstrated a significant increase in serious adverse events.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6–9</span></a> Thus, in the combined safety study testing search phase (phase II<span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">)</span> and III<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6–9</span></a> the rates of serious adverse were within the expected range. Moreover, in a combined safety analysis,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a> incidence rates per 100 patient-years of serious infections were slightly lower than published and further demonstrate that there was no increase with time.</p><p id="par0300" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the AMPLE study<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0050"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> that compared abatacept with SC adalimumab, only 1.3% of patients treated with SC abatacept had serious adverse events compared with 3% in patients receiving adalimumab. With regard to skin reactions, only 3% developed clinical manifestations. These figures are somewhat lower than shown by etanercept and adalimumab, over 10%. The most common reactions are pruritus and erythema, and appear to have an upward tendency when abatacept is administered SC in monotherapy than when given in combination with MTX. With regard to autoimmune events, the occurrence rates were also very low, in any case not exceeding 2% from 6.8 to 10.30. The development of SC Abatacept did not arouse any alarm signals with respect to an increase in the tumor rate.</p><p id="par0305" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In summary, SC abatacept is presented as an effective and safe drug and, therefore, as an alternative to the many treatments currently available to the rheumatologist to treat RA. It also has the advantage of being the only biological agent that can be administered IV and SC, which may facilitate its use in certain patients.</p></span><span id="sec0115" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0175">Ethical Responsibilities</span><span id="sec0120" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0180">Protection of people and animals</span><p id="par0310" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that no experiments have been performed on humans or animals.</p></span><span id="sec0125" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0185">Data privacy</span><p id="par9310" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors state that no patient data appears in this article.</p></span><span id="sec0130" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0190">Right to privacy and informed consent</span><p id="par0320" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors state that no patient data appears in this article.</p></span></span><span id="sec0135" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0195">Financing</span><p id="par0325" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This practical document has been financed through a contribution made to the Department of Rheumatology, La Paz University Hospital (AREPAZ), by Bristol Myers Squibb (Spain). The choice of experts was the sole responsibility of the project coordinator (EMM). No employee of the company participated in the scientific meetings or their development until the project was completed.</p></span><span id="sec0140" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0200">Conflict of Interest</span><p id="par0330" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors have no conflicts of interest</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:12 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xres348917" "titulo" => array:5 [ 0 => "Abstract" 1 => "Objective" 2 => "Method" 3 => "Results" 4 => "Conclusions" ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec330611" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xres348918" "titulo" => array:5 [ 0 => "Resumen" 1 => "Objetivo" 2 => "Método" 3 => "Resultados" 4 => "Conclusiones" ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec330610" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Methods" ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Results" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Pharmacokinetics" ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Efficacy" "secciones" => array:10 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Efficacy in the Short and Long Term (Level of Evidence 1b)" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Comparison of ACQUIRE With AIM" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "Loading Dose (Level of Evidence 1b)" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0045" "titulo" => "Fixed Subcutaneous Dose of Abatacept Regardless of Weight (Level of Evidence 1b)" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0050" "titulo" => "Replacing IV Abatacept With SC Abatacept (Level of Evidence 2b)" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0055" "titulo" => "Efficacy After Stopping and Restarting Treatment (Level of Evidence 2b)" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0060" "titulo" => "Monotherapy (Level of Evidence 2b)" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0065" "titulo" => "Functional Capacity (Level of Evidence 2b)" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0070" "titulo" => "Comparison With Adalimumab and Radiological Progression (Level of Evidence 1b)" ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0075" "titulo" => "Immunogenicity (Level of Evidence 2a)" ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0080" "titulo" => "Safety" "secciones" => array:5 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0085" "titulo" => "Serious Adverse Events (Level of Evidence 2a)" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0090" "titulo" => "Serious Infections" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0095" "titulo" => "Injection Site Skin Reactions" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0100" "titulo" => "Autoimmune Events" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0105" "titulo" => "Tumors" ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0110" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0115" "titulo" => "Ethical Responsibilities" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0120" "titulo" => "Protection of people and animals" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0125" "titulo" => "Data privacy" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0130" "titulo" => "Right to privacy and informed consent" ] ] ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0135" "titulo" => "Financing" ] 10 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0140" "titulo" => "Conflict of Interest" ] 11 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2013-05-01" "fechaAceptado" => "2013-11-06" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec330611" "palabras" => array:3 [ 0 => "Abatacept" 1 => "Evidence-based practice" 2 => "Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec330610" "palabras" => array:3 [ 0 => "Abatacept" 1 => "Práctica basada en pruebas" 2 => "Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Objective</span><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">To review the clinical evidence on subcutaneous (SC) abatacept and to formulate recommendations in order to clear up points related to its use in rheumatology.</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0015">Method</span><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">An expert panel of rheumatologists objectively summarized the evidence on the mechanism of action, practicality, effectiveness, and safety of abatacept sc and formulated recommendations after a literature review.</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0020">Results</span><p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The efficacy and safety of abatacept sc were studied in 7 clinical trials, 3 double-blind, 3 open, and one mixed, with the following endpoints: comparison against abatacept iv, impact on immunogenicity, effect of replacing iv by sc, abatacept sc in monotherapy, and non-inferiority to adalimumab. No significant differences were found between sc and iv abatacept on efficacy or safety. The development of sc abatacept has allowed a complementary study to the iv, formulation, thus making the abatacept profile better defined.</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Conclusions</span><p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">This is a practical document to supplement the summary of product characteristics. In summary, abatacept sc is presented as an effective and safe drug and, therefore, as an alternative to use within the broad armamentarium the rheumatologist has to treat RA. It also has the advantage of being the only biological agent that can be administered iv and sc which can facilitate its use in certain patients.</p>" ] "es" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Objetivo</span><p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Revisar la evidencia clínica sobre abatacept subcutáneo (sc) y emitir recomendaciones con objeto de aclarar su uso en reumatología.</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Método</span><p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Un panel de expertos reumatólogos resumió de forma objetiva las pruebas existentes sobre el mecanismo de acción, el modo de uso, la eficacia y la seguridad de abatacept sc y desarrolló un documento sobre el uso de este fármaco en situaciones concretas, previa revisión de la bibliografía.</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Resultados</span><p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">El abatacept sc sustenta su eficacia y seguridad en 7 ensayos clínicos, 3 doble ciego, 3 abiertos y uno mixto, en los que se compara la administración sc frente a la iv de abatacept, se estudia el posible impacto sobre la inmunogenicidad, el efecto de sustituir la vía iv por la sc en pacientes que previamente venían recibiendo abatacept iv, la monoterapia y la no inferioridad frente a adalimumab. No se han encontrado diferencias significativas frente a abatacept iv ni en cuanto a la eficacia ni en cuanto a la seguridad. El desarrollo de abatacept sc ha permitido un estudio complementario al del iv, con lo que el perfil del mismo queda más definido.</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Conclusiones</span><p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Se trata de un documento práctico como complemento a la información en ficha técnica. En resumen, el abatacept sc se presenta como un fármaco eficaz y seguro y, por lo tanto, como una alternativa más para utilizar entre los múltiples tratamientos con que cuenta hoy en día el reumatólogo. Además, cuenta con la ventaja de ser el único agente biológico que se puede administrar por vía iv y sc, lo cual puede facilitar su uso en determinados pacientes.</p>" ] ] "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "☆" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0010">Please cite this article as: Mola EM, Balsa A, Martínez Taboada V, Marenco JL, Navarro Sarabia F, Gómez-Reino J, et al. Documento práctico para el uso de abatacept subcutáneo. Reumatol Clin. 2014;10:218–226.</p>" ] ] "multimedia" => array:3 [ 0 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">O: open, RA: rheumatoid arthritis; ABA: abatacept, ADA: adalimumab, DB: double-blind, MTX: methotrexate; PBO: placebo, m: months.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Study \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Design \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Population included \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Intervention \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Comparator \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Outcomes measured \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">ACQUIRE (phase III b) Genovese et al., 2011<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">DB \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>m \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1457 RA with inadequate response to MTX \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">SC ABA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (n=693/736) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">IV ABA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (n=676/721) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">ACR20, ACR50 6-months and ACR70-HAQ, DAS28-safety-immunogenicity \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">ALLOW (phase III<span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">)</span> Kaine et al., 2012<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Period <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">I:</span> OPeriod <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">II:</span> DBPeriod <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">III:</span> O \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>m \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">167 RA with inadequate response to MTX \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Period <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">I:</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SC ABA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (n=167)Period <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">II:</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SC ABA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (n=40)Period <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">III:</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SC ABA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (n=40) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Period <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">I:</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>No comparisonPeriod <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">II:</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SC placebo<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (n=80)Period <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">III:</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>IV placebo<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (n=44)IV ABA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (n=35) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Period <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">I:</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>DAS28 reductionPeriod <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">II:</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>DAS28, HAQ-immunogenicity, safetyPeriod <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">III:</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>DAS28, HAQ-immunogenicity, safety \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Attune (phase III b) Keystone et al., 2012<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">O \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>m \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">123 RA treated with IV ABA \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">SC ABA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No comparison \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Safety, immunogenicity DAS28-HAQ \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">ACCOMPANY (phase III<span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">)</span> Nash et al., 2012<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0045"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">O \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>m \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">RA patients treated with traditional and biological DMARDs \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">ABA SC (n=49) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">SC ABA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (n=51) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">ImmunogenicitySafetyDAS28 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">AMPLE Schiff et al., 2012<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">31</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">DB \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">12<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>m \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">646 RA with inadequate response to MTX \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">SC ABA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (n=318) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">SC ADA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (n=328) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70DAS28Radiographic progression, safety \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">SC ABA vs IV ABA in Japanese RA patients Matsubaraet al., 2012 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">DB \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>m \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">118 RA with inadequate response to MTX \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">SC ABA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (n=59) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">IV ABA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (n=59) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70DAS28, HAQ immunogenicity \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">SC ABA vs IV ABA: Post hoc efficacy analysis Genovese et al., 2012 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">O \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">18<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>m \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1750 patients who had previously received SC ABA or IV ABA \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">SC ABA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (n=1372) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">IV ABA<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (n=378) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70DAS28SDAI, CDAI, LDAS, HAQ \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab520498.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Description of Abatacept Clinical Trials.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0010" "etiqueta" => "Table 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="center" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">ALLOW (IV overload)</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="center" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">ACCOMPANY (no IV overload)</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">DAS28 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">HAQ \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">DAS28 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">HAQ \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Baseline \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">4.7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">5.4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1 month \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3.7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.0<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>4.5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3 months \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3.2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3.7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab520496.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Comparison of the Efficacy Results of the ACCOMPANY and ALLOW Studies.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0015" "etiqueta" => "Table 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:3 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Serious adverse event: event that involves withdrawal.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Study \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">% serious adverse events \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">% overall infections \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">% serious infections \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">% skin reaction at the injection site \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">% autoimmune events \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">% neoplasia \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " rowspan="4" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Combined data<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a><span class="elsevierStyleSup">,</span><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a></td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0–6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>m \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (8, 12) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2.4 (1.6, 3.7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">5.6 (4.2, 7.4) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.5 (0.9, 2.0) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.3 (0.1, 1.0) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">6–12<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>m \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">11 (9, 13) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2.1 (1.3, 3.4) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.7 (0.3, 1.6) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.9 (0.5, 1.9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.1 (0.6, 2.0) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">12–18<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>m \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 (6, 11) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2.1 (1.3, 3.4) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.4 (0.8, 1.6) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.5 (0.9, 2.6) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.4 (0.1, 1.1) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">18–24<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>m \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (6, 13) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.5 (0.7, 3.4) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2.0 (1.2, 3.3) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.7 (0.3, 1.6) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="8" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">ACQUIRE (phase III b) Genovese et al., 2011<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="center" valign="middle">1.1</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">31.8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2.6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="8" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " rowspan="3" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">ALLOW (phase III b) Kaine et al., 2012<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a></td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Period <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">I</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">25.1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Period <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">II</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">12.5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Period <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">III</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">17.5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="8" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Attune (phase III b) Keystone et al., 2012<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="center" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.8</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">16.3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">ACCOMPANY Nash et al., 2012<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0045"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="center" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">4</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">– \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">AMPLE Schiff et al., 2012<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">31</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="center" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.3</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2.2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2.2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3.2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3.1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">IV ABA vs SC ABA in Japanese RA patients Matsubara et al., 2012<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0140"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="center" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">5.1</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">33.9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.02 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab520497.png" ] ] ] "notaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "tblfn0005" "etiqueta" => "a" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">Data expressed as incidence per 100 patient-years, with a confidence interval of 95% in brackets.</p>" ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Safety of Subcutaneous Abatacept in Clinical Trials.</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0005" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:35 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0005" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Factors influencing the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "H. Schellekens" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1093/ndt/gfh1092" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Nephrol Dial Transplant" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "20" "numero" => "Suppl. 6" "paginaInicial" => "vi3" "paginaFinal" => "vi9" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15958824" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0010" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Immunogenicity of anti-TNF-alpha agents in autoimmune diseases" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "N. Emi Aikawa" 1 => "J.F. de Carvalho" 2 => "C. Artur Almeida Silva" 3 => "E. Bonfa" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s12016-009-8140-3" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Clin Rev Allergy Immunol" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "38" "paginaInicial" => "82" "paginaFinal" => "89" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19565360" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0015" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Clinical efficacy and safety of abatacept in methotrexate-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and poor prognostic factors" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "R. Westhovens" 1 => "M. Robles" 2 => "A.C. Ximenes" 3 => "S. Nayiager" 4 => "J. Wollenhaupt" 5 => "P. Durez" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/ard.2008.101121" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "68" "paginaInicial" => "1870" "paginaFinal" => "1877" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19124524" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0020" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Effects of abatacept in patients with methotrexate-resistant active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J.M. Kremer" 1 => "H.K. Genant" 2 => "L.W. Moreland" 3 => "A.S. Russell" 4 => "P. Emery" 5 => "C. Abud-Mendoza" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Intern Med" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "144" "paginaInicial" => "865" "paginaFinal" => "876" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16785475" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0025" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibition" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M.C. Genovese" 1 => "J.C. Becker" 2 => "M. Schiff" 3 => "M. Luggen" 4 => "Y. Sherrer" 5 => "J. Kremer" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1056/NEJMoa050524" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "N Engl J Med" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "353" "paginaInicial" => "1114" "paginaFinal" => "1123" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16162882" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0030" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Subcutaneous abatacept versus intravenous abatacept: a phase IIIb noninferiority study in patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M.C. Genovese" 1 => "A. Covarrubias" 2 => "G. Leon" 3 => "E. Mysler" 4 => "M. Keiserman" 5 => "R. Valente" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/art.30463" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arthritis Rheum" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "63" "paginaInicial" => "2854" "paginaFinal" => "2864" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21618201" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0035" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Evaluation of abatacept administered subcutaneously in adults with active rheumatoid arthritis: impact of withdrawal and reintroduction on immunogenicity, efficacy and safety (phase IIIb ALLOW study)" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J. Kaine" 1 => "G. Gladstein" 2 => "I. Strusberg" 3 => "M. Robles" 4 => "I. Louw" 5 => "S. Gujrathi" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200344" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "71" "paginaInicial" => "38" "paginaFinal" => "44" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21917824" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0040" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Abatacept in subjects who switch from intravenous to subcutaneous therapy: results from the phase IIIb ATTUNE Study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "E.C. Keystone" 1 => "J.M. Kremer" 2 => "A. Russell" 3 => "J. Box" 4 => "C. Abud-Mendoza" 5 => "M.G. Elizondo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200355" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "71" "paginaInicial" => "857" "paginaFinal" => "861" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22302417" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0045" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Immunogenicity, safety and efficacy of abatacept administered subcutaneously with or without background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from accompany, a phase III study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "P. Nash" 1 => "S. Nayiager" 2 => "M.C. Genovese" 3 => "A.J. Kivitz" 4 => "K. Oelke" 5 => "C. Ludivico" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "65" "paginaInicial" => "718" "paginaFinal" => "728" ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0050" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Head-to-head comparison of subcutaneous abatacept versus adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis: findings of a phase IIIb, multinational, prospective, randomized study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M.E. Weinblatt" 1 => "M. Schiff" 2 => "R. Valente" 3 => "D. van der heijde" 4 => "G. Citera" 5 => "C. Zhao" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/art.37711" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arthritis Rheum" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "65" "paginaInicial" => "28" "paginaFinal" => "38" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23169319" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0055" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Subcutaneous administration of abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M. Corbo" 1 => "X. Valencia" 2 => "R. Raymond" 3 => "R. Summerill" 4 => "S. Agrawal" 5 => "R. Townsend" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "68" "numero" => "Suppl. 3" "paginaInicial" => "574" ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0060" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Food and Drug Administration highlights of prescribing information. ORENCIA (abatacept)" ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:1 [ "fecha" => "2011" ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0065" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Oxford Centre for evidence-based medicine levels of evidence" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "B. Phillips" 1 => "C. Ball" 2 => "D. Sackett" 3 => "D. Badenoch" 4 => "S. Straus" 5 => "B. Haynes" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:1 [ "fecha" => "2011" ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0070" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Modeling and simulation of abatacept exposure and interleukin-6 response in support of recommended doses for rheumatoid arthritis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A. Roy" 1 => "D.R. Mould" 2 => "X.F. Wang" 3 => "L. Tay" 4 => "R. Raymond" 5 => "M. Pfister" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1177/0091270007307573" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Clin Pharmacol" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "47" "paginaInicial" => "1408" "paginaFinal" => "1420" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17962428" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0075" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Assessment of dose proportionality, absolute bioavailability, and immunogenicity response of CTLA4Ig (BMS-188667), a novel immunosuppressive agent, following subcutaneous and intravenous administration to rats" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "N.R. Srinivas" 1 => "W.C. Shyu" 2 => "R.S. Weiner" 3 => "G. Warner" 4 => "C. Comereski" 5 => "L.K. Tay" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Pharm Res" "fecha" => "1997" "volumen" => "14" "paginaInicial" => "911" "paginaFinal" => "916" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9244149" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0080" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Pharmacokinetics of CTLA4Ig (BMS-188667), a novel immunosuppressive agent, following intravenous and subcutaneous administration to mice" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "N.R. Srinivas" 1 => "W.C. Shyu" 2 => "R.S. Weiner" 3 => "L.K. Tay" 4 => "D.S. Greene" 5 => "R.H. Barbhaiya" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Pharm Sci" "fecha" => "1995" "volumen" => "84" "paginaInicial" => "1488" "paginaFinal" => "1489" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8748333" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0085" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Clinical pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous abatacept in the presence or absence of an intravenous loading dose in patients with rheumatoid arthritis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "B. Murthy" 1 => "L. Gao" 2 => "B. Vakkalagadda" 3 => "J. Yin" 4 => "J. White" 5 => "Z. Zhou" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "70" "numero" => "Suppl 3" "paginaInicial" => "459" ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0090" "etiqueta" => "18" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous abatacept support a fixed dosing regimen in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "B. Murthy" 1 => "L. Gao" 2 => "J. Yin" 3 => "J. White" 4 => "Z. Zhou" 5 => "N. Thanneer" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "70" "numero" => "Suppl. 3" "paginaInicial" => "460" ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0095" "etiqueta" => "19" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with or without an intravenous (iv) loading dose" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "P. Nash" 1 => "C. Ludivico" 2 => "I. Delaet" 3 => "K. Qi" 4 => "B. Murthy" 5 => "M. Corbo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arthritis Rheum" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "63" "numero" => "Suppl. 10" "paginaInicial" => "404" ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0100" "etiqueta" => "20" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Low immunogenicity, consistent safety and sustained clinical efficacy over 18 months of subcutaneous administration of abatacept with and without methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid artritis—results from a phase III study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "P. Nash" 1 => "S. Nayiager" 2 => "M.C. Genovese" 3 => "C. Rodriguez" 4 => "I. Delaet" 5 => "A. Elegbe" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/ard.2008.102137" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "69" "numero" => "Suppl. 3" "paginaInicial" => "97" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19346220" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0105" "etiqueta" => "21" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Ficha técnica Orencia<span class="elsevierStyleSup">®</span> (abatacept)" ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:2 [ "fecha" => "2012" "editorial" => "Bristol-Myers Squibb" ] ] ] ] ] ] 21 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0110" "etiqueta" => "22" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "SC vs IV abatacept in RA: post-hoc efficacy analysis of long-term ACQUIRE (SC) data with AIM (IV) data" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M.C. Genovese" 1 => "C. Pacheco Tena" 2 => "A. Covarrubias" 3 => "G. Leon" 4 => "E. Mysler" 5 => "M. Keiserman" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/ard.2011.200059" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "71" "numero" => "Suppl. 3" "paginaInicial" => "378" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21972241" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 22 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0115" "etiqueta" => "23" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Improvements in disease activity and physical function in patients with RA receiving subcutaneous abatacept in the presence or absence of an initial IV loading dose" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "P. Nash" 1 => "C. Ludivico" 2 => "I. Delaet" 3 => "K. Qi" 4 => "J. Kaine" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "70" "numero" => "Suppl. 3" "paginaInicial" => "615" ] ] ] ] ] ] 23 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0120" "etiqueta" => "24" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Changes in patient reported outcomes in response to subcutaneous abatacept or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: Results from the AMPLE (Abatacept Versus Adalimumab Comparison in Biologic-Naive RA Subjects with Background Methotrexate) Trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "R. Fleischmann" 1 => "M. Weinblatt" 2 => "M. Schiff" 3 => "M. Maldonado" 4 => "E.M. Massarotti" 5 => "Y. Yazici" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arthritis Rheum" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "64" "numero" => "10 Suppl." "paginaInicial" => "S578" ] ] ] ] ] ] 24 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0125" "etiqueta" => "25" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Dealing with immunogenicity of biologicals: assessment and clinical relevance" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "G.J. Wolbink" 1 => "L.A. Aarden" 2 => "B.A. Dijkmans" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Curr Opin Rheumatol" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "21" "paginaInicial" => "211" "paginaFinal" => "215" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19399992" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 25 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0130" "etiqueta" => "26" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Evaluation of immunogenicity of the T cell costimulation modulator abatacept in patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "H.G. Haggerty" 1 => "M.A. Abbott" 2 => "T.P. Reilly" 3 => "D.A. DeVona" 4 => "C.R. Gleason" 5 => "L. Tay" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Rheumatol" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "34" "paginaInicial" => "2365" "paginaFinal" => "2373" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18050376" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 26 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0135" "etiqueta" => "27" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Differential effect of drug interference in immunogenicity assays" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M.H. Hart" 1 => "H. de Vrieze" 2 => "D. Wouters" 3 => "G.J. Wolbink" 4 => "J. Killestein" 5 => "E.R. de Groot" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jim.2011.07.019" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Immunol Methods" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "372" "paginaInicial" => "196" "paginaFinal" => "203" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21824477" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 27 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0140" "etiqueta" => "28" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A multi-center, double-dummy, double-blind study of subcutaneous (SC) abatacept (ABA) compared with intraveneous (iv) ABA in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "colaboracion" => "Japan Abatacept Study Group" "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "T. Matsubara" 1 => "H. Inoue" 2 => "M. Iwahashi" 3 => "A. Yamazaki" 4 => "T. Takeuchi" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "71" "numero" => "Suppl. 3" "paginaInicial" => "197" ] ] ] ] ] ] 28 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0145" "etiqueta" => "29" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Immunogenicity is not increased with subcutaneous administration of abatacept with and without methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a phase III study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "P. Nash" 1 => "S. Nayiager" 2 => "M.C. Genovese" 3 => "A.J. Kivitz" 4 => "K. Oelke" 5 => "C. Ludivico" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arthritis Rheum" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "60" "numero" => "Suppl. 10" "paginaInicial" => "1692" ] ] ] ] ] ] 29 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0150" "etiqueta" => "30" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Safety of sc abatacept in patients with RA: update from pooled clinical trial data" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "R. Alten" 1 => "J. Kaine" 2 => "E.C. Keystone" 3 => "P. Nash" 4 => "I. Delaet" 5 => "K. Qi" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "71" "numero" => "Suppl. 3" "paginaInicial" => "670" ] ] ] ] ] ] 30 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0155" "etiqueta" => "31" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Abatacept sc versus adalimumab on background methotrexate in RA: one year results from the AMPLE study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M. Schiff" 1 => "R. Fleischmann" 2 => "M. Weinblatt" 3 => "R. Valente" 4 => "Heijde D. Van der" 5 => "G. Citera" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "71" "numero" => "Suppl. 3" "paginaInicial" => "60" ] ] ] ] ] ] 31 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0160" "etiqueta" => "32" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Therapeutic effect of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate compared with each treatment alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: double-blind randomised controlled trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "L. Klareskog" 1 => "D. van der Heijde" 2 => "J.P. de Jager" 3 => "A. Gough" 4 => "J. Kalden" 5 => "M. Malaise" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15640-7" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Lancet" "fecha" => "2004" "volumen" => "363" "paginaInicial" => "675" "paginaFinal" => "681" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15001324" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 32 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0165" "etiqueta" => "33" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Efficacy and safety of combination etanercept and methotrexate versus etanercept alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate: the ADORE study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "P.L. Van Riel" 1 => "A.J. Taggart" 2 => "J. Sany" 3 => "M. Gaubitz" 4 => "H.W. Nab" 5 => "R. Pedersen" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/ard.2005.043299" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "65" "paginaInicial" => "1478" "paginaFinal" => "1483" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16464988" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 33 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0170" "etiqueta" => "34" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Adalimumab, a fully human anti tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody, and concomitant standard antirheumatic therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: results of STAR (Safety Trial of Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis)" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "D.E. Furst" 1 => "M.H. Schiff" 2 => "R.M. Fleischmann" 3 => "V. Strand" 4 => "C.A. Birbara" 5 => "D. Compagnone" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Rheumatol" "fecha" => "2003" "volumen" => "30" "paginaInicial" => "2563" "paginaFinal" => "2571" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14719195" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 34 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0175" "etiqueta" => "35" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Recent concepts in the inhibition of radiographic progression with biologics" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "E. Keystone" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/BOR.0b013e328329f84f" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Curr Opin Rheumatol" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "21" "paginaInicial" => "231" "paginaFinal" => "237" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19365267" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/21735743/0000001000000004/v1_201406280041/S2173574314000343/v1_201406280041/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "17338" "tipo" => "SECCION" "es" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Original Article" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/21735743/0000001000000004/v1_201406280041/S2173574314000343/v1_201406280041/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004M&text.app=https://reumatologiaclinica.org/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173574314000343?idApp=UINPBA00004M" ]
Year/Month | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 November | 4 | 5 | 9 |
2024 October | 55 | 34 | 89 |
2024 September | 77 | 19 | 96 |
2024 August | 70 | 27 | 97 |
2024 July | 84 | 26 | 110 |
2024 June | 85 | 31 | 116 |
2024 May | 82 | 30 | 112 |
2024 April | 73 | 22 | 95 |
2024 March | 63 | 32 | 95 |
2024 February | 63 | 24 | 87 |
2024 January | 42 | 19 | 61 |
2023 December | 34 | 26 | 60 |
2023 November | 54 | 32 | 86 |
2023 October | 43 | 32 | 75 |
2023 September | 159 | 36 | 195 |
2023 August | 62 | 19 | 81 |
2023 July | 53 | 25 | 78 |
2023 June | 51 | 26 | 77 |
2023 May | 52 | 21 | 73 |
2023 April | 38 | 15 | 53 |
2023 March | 77 | 31 | 108 |
2023 February | 61 | 36 | 97 |
2023 January | 59 | 40 | 99 |
2022 December | 67 | 54 | 121 |
2022 November | 60 | 55 | 115 |
2022 October | 58 | 18 | 76 |
2022 September | 47 | 32 | 79 |
2022 August | 83 | 43 | 126 |
2022 July | 43 | 47 | 90 |
2022 June | 49 | 34 | 83 |
2022 May | 43 | 46 | 89 |
2022 April | 50 | 41 | 91 |
2022 March | 51 | 52 | 103 |
2022 February | 50 | 37 | 87 |
2022 January | 32 | 42 | 74 |
2021 December | 36 | 37 | 73 |
2021 November | 41 | 57 | 98 |
2021 October | 45 | 46 | 91 |
2021 September | 35 | 43 | 78 |
2021 August | 27 | 34 | 61 |
2021 July | 18 | 35 | 53 |
2021 June | 28 | 39 | 67 |
2021 May | 53 | 47 | 100 |
2021 April | 67 | 99 | 166 |
2021 March | 48 | 27 | 75 |
2021 February | 44 | 30 | 74 |
2021 January | 28 | 27 | 55 |
2020 December | 38 | 32 | 70 |
2020 November | 38 | 20 | 58 |
2020 October | 12 | 12 | 24 |
2020 September | 39 | 26 | 65 |
2020 August | 24 | 19 | 43 |
2020 July | 34 | 12 | 46 |
2020 June | 30 | 22 | 52 |
2020 May | 24 | 9 | 33 |
2020 April | 22 | 16 | 38 |
2020 March | 23 | 15 | 38 |
2018 May | 5 | 0 | 5 |
2018 April | 30 | 12 | 42 |
2018 March | 48 | 9 | 57 |
2018 February | 17 | 1 | 18 |
2018 January | 33 | 9 | 42 |
2017 December | 27 | 5 | 32 |
2017 November | 28 | 4 | 32 |
2017 October | 29 | 3 | 32 |
2017 September | 40 | 5 | 45 |
2017 August | 57 | 14 | 71 |
2017 July | 41 | 11 | 52 |
2017 June | 84 | 9 | 93 |
2017 May | 77 | 21 | 98 |
2017 April | 57 | 6 | 63 |
2017 March | 51 | 21 | 72 |
2017 February | 39 | 10 | 49 |
2017 January | 43 | 3 | 46 |
2016 December | 55 | 17 | 72 |
2016 November | 41 | 2 | 43 |
2016 October | 63 | 9 | 72 |
2016 September | 67 | 14 | 81 |
2016 August | 47 | 10 | 57 |
2016 July | 34 | 11 | 45 |
2015 December | 2 | 0 | 2 |
2015 August | 5 | 0 | 5 |
2015 July | 18 | 6 | 24 |
2015 June | 46 | 6 | 52 |
2015 May | 97 | 14 | 111 |
2015 April | 106 | 11 | 117 |
2015 March | 99 | 14 | 113 |
2015 February | 79 | 12 | 91 |
2015 January | 77 | 14 | 91 |
2014 December | 58 | 14 | 72 |
2014 November | 48 | 10 | 58 |
2014 October | 49 | 14 | 63 |
2014 September | 36 | 22 | 58 |
2014 August | 60 | 25 | 85 |
2014 July | 67 | 40 | 107 |