TY - JOUR T1 - Response to local corticosteroid injections in carpal tunnel syndrome with normal conduction studies JO - Reumatología Clínica (English Edition) T2 - AU - Ly-Pen,Domingo AU - Andreu,José-Luis AU - de Blas,Gema AU - Sánchez-Olaso,Alberto AU - Millán,Isabel SN - 1699258X M3 - 10.1016/j.reuma.2021.04.012 DO - 10.1016/j.reuma.2021.04.012 UR - https://reumatologiaclinica.org/es-response-local-corticosteroid-injections-in-articulo-S1699258X21001340 AB - IntroductionNerve conduction studies (NCS) have been considered as the gold standard in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) diagnosis, despite correlation between clinical symptomatology and NCS severity has shown to be poor. In fact, clinical symptoms precede NCS changes in months or years. Few papers have been published about the clinical response to treatment of clinically typical CTS, but with normal NCS (NNCS). ObjectiveTo compare the clinical response to local corticosteroid injections (LCI) in clinically typical CTS, with NNCS and abnormal NCS (ANCS). MethodWe included patients older than 18, with typical CTS symptoms (ongoing daily nocturnal pain/paresthesias in hand, at least during 3 months). Follow-up was done at 3, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcome was the visual analog scale for pain (p-VAS), comparing NNCS CTS wrists with ANCS CTS wrists. Statistic signification was established by the Student's t test, Mann–Whitney's “U”, χ2 test and Yates’ correction. ResultsWe included 44 wrists in the NNCS group, and 83 in the ANCS group. There was no statistical significance between data in both groups, except in the 12-month follow-up, where the NNCS group achieved better results than the ANCS group in the 20% response (p=0.006). There was a trend toward a better 50% response in the 12-month follow-up. ConclusionsOur data suggest that LCI are similarly effective in both CTS with NNCS and ANCS. Nonetheless, there is a mild better effect in NNCS than in ANCS at 12-month follow-up. ER -