Journal Information
Vol. 2. Issue 5.
Pages 247-250 (September - October 2006)
Vol. 2. Issue 5.
Pages 247-250 (September - October 2006)
Originales
Full text access
Micofenolato de mofetilo en nefritis lúpica refractaria a ciclofosfamida intravenosa
Mycophenolate mofetil in lupus nephritis refractory to intravenous cyclophosphamide
Visits
17501
Leonel Dazaa,
Corresponding author
leonel.daza@imss.gob.mx
daza6208@hotmail.com

Correspondencia: Dr. L. Daza. Unidad de Investigación Clínica. Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad IMSS Blvd. A. López Mateos e Insurgentes, s/n. Colonia, Moderna. 37480 León Guanajuato. México.
, Salvador Pérezb, Ulises Velascob, Martha Hernándeza
a Unidad de Investigación Clínica. Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad IMSS. León Guanajuato. México
b Departamento de Reumatología. Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad IMSS. León Guanajuato. México
This item has received
Article information
Objetivo

Evaluar el uso del micofenolato de mofetilo (MMF) en pacientes con nefropatía lúpica (NL) y fracaso al tratamiento inicial con ciclofosfamida intravenosa (i.v.), durante un período de 12 meses.

Pacientes y métodos

Se incluyeron 11 pacientes con NL. La dosis de MMF fue de 1,5-2 g/día. Se midieron la depuración de creatinina, creatinina sérica y proteinuria en orina de 24 h; asimismo, se anotaron los episodios adversos con el tratamiento durante los 12 meses.

Resultados

La proteinuria basal disminuyó con MMF de 1,63 (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 0,78-2,5) a 0,93 g/l (IC del 95%, 0,1-1,62) en el doceavo mes, con un valor de p = 0,04. La depuración de creatinina tuvo una tendencia a la mejoría, sin embargo no hubo diferencia estadística, 69,2 (IC del 95%, 51,4-87,4) frente a 79,29 ml/min (IC del 95%, 49,2-109,3), con una p = 0,90. Las demás variables no mostraron diferencias significativas. Los pacientes que no respondieron a MMF tuvieron los índices de cronicidad más altos que los pacientes con respuesta buena o regular.

Conclusión

El MMF a dosis de 1,5-2,0 g/día es una buena alternativa en la NL con bajos índices de cronicidad y con fallo a la ciclofosfamida i.v., sin efectos colaterales graves.

Palabras clave:
Nefritis lúpica
Micofenolato mofetilo
Ciclofosfamida
Lupus eritematoso generalizado
Objective

To evaluate the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in lupus nephritis (LN) patients with prior failure to intravenous cyclophosphamide over a 12-month follow-up.

Patients and methods

Eleven patients with LN were included. MMF doses ranged from 1.5-2 grams per day. In all patients, 24-h urinary protein excretion, creatinine clearance, and serum creatinine were evaluated. Treatment-related adverse effects were recorded over the 12-month follow-up.

Results

Basal proteinuria decreased from 1.63 g/L (95% CI: 0.78-2.5) to 0.93 (95% CI: 0.1-1.62) g/L at the end of the follow-up period (p = 0.04). Creatinine clearance showed a tendency to improve but no statistically significant differences were found, 69.2 (95% CI 51.4- 87.4) vs. 79.29 (IC 95% 49.2-109.3) ml/min, respectively; p = 0.90). No significant differences were found in the remaining variables. Patients without response to MMF had a higher chronicity index than those with good or average response.

Conclusion

MMF doses of 1.5-2 grams per day are a good alternative in LN patients without response to intravenous cyclophosphamide and a low chronicity index. No severe adverse effects were found.

Key words:
Lupus nephritis
Mycophenolate mofetil
Cyclophosphamide
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
M.C. Carrol.
The lupus paradox: Natural immunity is protective against disease.
Kidney Int, 65 (2004), pp. 1540
[2.]
D. Pisetski.
Systemic lupus erythematosus, epidemiology, pathology and pathogenesis.
Primer on the rheumatic diseases, pp. 246-251
[3.]
L. Martins, G. Rocha, A. Rodríguez, J. Santos, C. Vasconcelos, J. Correia, et al.
Lupus nephritis: a retrospective review of 78 cases from a single center.
Clin Nephrol, 57 (2002), pp. 114-119
[4.]
S.M. Korbet, E.J. Lewis, M.M. Schwartz, M. Reichlin, J. Evans, R.D. Rohde.
Factors predictive of outcome in severe lupus nephritis. Lupus Nephritis Collaborative Study Group.
Am J Kidney Dis, 35 (2000), pp. 904-914
[5.]
R. Cervera, M. Khamashta, J. Font, G. Sebastián, A. Gil, P. Lavilla, The European Working Party on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, et al.
Systemic lupus erythematosus: Clinical and immunologic patterns of disease expression in a cohort of 1,000 patients.
Medicine, 72 (1993), pp. 113-124
[6.]
M. Abu Shakra, M. Urowitz, D. Gladman, J. Gough.
Mortality studies in systemic lupus erythematosus results from a single center. I. Causes of death.
J Rheumatol, 22 (1995), pp. 1259-1264
[7.]
R. Herrera-Esparza, O. Barbosa, H. Villalobos, E. Avalos.
Renal expression of IL-6 and TNF alpha genes in lupus nephritis.
Lupus, 7 (1998), pp. 134-138
[8.]
I. Badillo-Almaraz, L. Daza, E. Avalos-Díaz, R. Herrera-Esparza.
Glomerular expression of FAS ligand and BAX mRNA in lupus nephritis.
Autoimmunity, 34 (2001), pp. 283-289
[9.]
H.A. Austin III, J.H. Klippel, J.E. Balow, N.G. Le Riche, A.D. Steinberg, P.H. Plotz, et al.
Therapy of lupus nephritis. Controlled trial of prednisone and cytotoxic drugs.
N Engl J Med, 314 (1986), pp. 614-619
[10.]
M.F. Gourley, I.II. Austin HA, D. Scott, C.H. Yarboro, E.M. Vaughan, J. Muir, et al.
Methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide, alone or in combination, in patients with lupus nephritis. A randomized, controlled trial.
Ann Intern Med, 125 (1996), pp. 549-557
[11.]
R.E. Bullingham, A.J. Nicholls, B.R. Kamm.
Clinical pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil.
Clin Pharmacokinetics, 34 (1998), pp. 429
[12.]
A.C. Allison, E.M. Eugui.
Mycophenolate mofetil and its mechanisms of action.
Immunopharmacology, 47 (2000), pp. 85
[13.]
C.A. Jonsson, H. Carlsten.
Mycophenolic acid inhibits inosine 5’-monophosphate dehydrogenase and suppresses production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, nitric oxide, and LDH in macrophages.
Cell Immunol, 216 (2002), pp. 93-101
[14.]
G. Contreras, V. Pardo, B. Leclercq, O. Leonz, E. Tozman, P. O’Nan, et al.
Sequential therapies for proliferative lupus nephritis.
N Engl J Med, 350 (2004), pp. 971-980
[15.]
J. Cross, A. Dwomoa, P. Andrews, A. Burns, C. Gordon, J. Main, Renal Association Clinical Trials Subcommittee, et al.
Mycophenolate mofetil for remission induction in severe lupus nephritis.
Nephron Clin Pract, 100 (2005), pp. c92-c100
[16.]
E.M. Tan, A.S. Cohen, J.F. Fries, A.T. Masi, D.J. McShane, N.F. Rothfield, et al.
The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Arthritis Rheum, 25 (1982), pp. 1271-1277
[17.]
E.M. Ginzler, C. Aranow.
Mycophenolate mofetil in lupus nephritis.
Lupus, 14 (2005), pp. 59-64
[18.]
G. Hill, M. Delahousse, D. Nochy, C.H. Mandet, J. Bariéty.
Proteinuria and tubulointerstitial lesions in lupus nephritis.
Kidney Int, 60 (2001), pp. 1893-1903
[19.]
J.P. Grande, J.E. Balow.
Renal biopsy in lupus nephritis.
Lupus, 7 (1998), pp. 611-617
[20.]
S. Bujais, J. Ordi-Ros, J. Paredes, M. Mauri, L. Matas, J. Cortés, et al.
Contribution of the inicial features of systemic lupus erythematosus to the clinical evolution and survival of a cohort of Mediterranean patients.
Ann Rheum Dis, 62 (2003), pp. 859-865
[21.]
L. Ding, M. Zhao, W. Zou, Y. Liu, H. Wang.
Mycophenolate mofetil combined with prednisone for diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis: a histopathological study.
Lupus, 13 (2004), pp. 113-118
[22.]
T.M. Chan, K.C. Tse, C.S. Tang, M.Y. Mok, F.K. Li.
Long-term study of mycophenolate mofetil as continous induction and maintenance treatment for diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis.
J Am Soc Nephrol, 16 (2005), pp. 1076-1084
Copyright © 2006. Elsevier España S.L. Barcelona
Download PDF
Idiomas
Reumatología Clínica (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?