Journal Information
Vol. 2. Issue 6.
Pages 313-321 (November - December 2006)
Vol. 2. Issue 6.
Pages 313-321 (November - December 2006)
Revisiones
Full text access
Tratamiento inmunosupresor en pacientes con glomerulonefritis lúpica. Revisión de eventos adversos
Immunosuppresive treatment in patients with lupus glomerulonephritis. Review of adverse events
Visits
14218
Juan M. Miranda Limón
Corresponding author
jmmlimon@prodigy.net.mx

Correspondencia: Dr. J.M. Miranda Limón. Departamento de Reumatología. Hospital del Especialidades. Centro Médico Nacional La Raza. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Seris y Zaachila, Colonia La Raza. Azcapotzalco 02990. México DF. México.
, Lucero Mendoza, Miguel A. Saavedra
Departamento de Reumatología. Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad Dr. Antonio Fraga Mouret. Centro Médico Nacional La Raza. IMSS. México DF. México
This item has received
Article information

El pronóstico de la nefritis lúpica ha mejorado notablemente en las últimas décadas, debido al mejor conocimiento de la patogenia e historial natural de la enfermedad, mejores esquemas terapéuticos y a la disponibilidad de nuevos fármacos para las enfermedades intercurrentes. La ciclofosfamida (CFM) se considera aún la mejor alternativa terapéutica inicial para la nefritis proliferativa, si bien aún existe controversia en relación al mejor esquema de dosificación, duración del tratamiento y terapia de mantenimiento después de la inducción. Sin embargo, para el médico y el paciente son motivo de gran preocupación la presencia de eventos adversos tales como las infecciones graves, neoplasias o amenorrea permanente. Para los casos resistentes al tratamiento, se pueden considerar nuevos inmunosupresores y agentes inmunoablativos, análogos de nucleósidos y terapia biológica. En todos estos casos, sin embargo, será necesario contar con estudios a largo plazo que verifiquen que estos nuevos tratamientos, con satisfactoria respuesta inicial, mantengan la respuesta y con menores efectos secundarios.

Palabras clave:
Nefritis lúpica
Ciclofosfamida
Eventos adversos

The prognosis of lupus nephritis has improved significantly over the past few decades. This has been partly contributed to by a better understanding of the natural history of the disease, improved treatment regimens, and the use of adjunctive treatments. Despite the development of new modalities, cyclophosphamide (CYC) remains the preferred initial treatment for severe proliferative lupus nephritis. Controversies continue about the best route, dosage, and duration of CYC treatment. However, adverse events as major infections, neoplasia and permanent amenorrhea, remain as a great concern for physicians and patients. For recalcitrant disease, new immunosuppresive and immunomodulating agents, nucleoside analogues and the biological response modifiers can be considered. New treatments directed against more specific targets may theoretically be associated with higher efficacy and lower toxicity. Longterm studies are needed with new treatments to verify this assumed lower toxicity.

Key words:
Lupus nephritis
Cyclophosphamide
Adverse events
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
A.D. Steinberg, S.C. Steinberg.
Long-term preservation of renal function in patients with lupus nephritis receiving treatment that includes cyclophosphamide versus those treated with prednisolone alone.
Arthritis Rheum, 34 (1991), pp. 945-950
[2.]
D.T. Boumpas, H.A. Austin III, E.M. Vaughn, et al.
Controlled trial of pulse methylprednisolone versus two regimens of pulse cyclophosphamide in severe lupus nephritis.
Lancet, 340 (1992), pp. 741-745
[3.]
S.M. Dawisha, C.H. Yarboro, E.M. Vaughan, et al.
Outpatient monthly oral bolus cyclophosphamide therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus.
J Rheumatol, 23 (1996), pp. 273-278
[4.]
W.J. McCune.
Oral bolus cyclophosphamide-liberating libation or nauseating nostrum?.
J Rheumatol, 23 (1996), pp. 212-213
[5.]
L. Bono, J.S. Cameron, J.A. Hicks.
The very long-term prognosis of lupus nephritis and its treatment.
QJ Med, 92 (1999), pp. 211-218
[6.]
G.G. Illei, H.A. Austin III, M. Crane, et al.
Combination therapy with pulse cyclophosphamide plus pulse methylprednisolone improves long-term renal outcome without adding toxicity in patients with lupus nephritis.
Ann Intern Med, 135 (2001), pp. 248-257
[7.]
E.J. Lewis.
The treatment of lupus nephritis: revisiting Galen.
Ann Intern Med, 135 (2001), pp. 296-298
[8.]
C.C. Mok, C.T.K. Ho, K.W. Chan, et al.
Outcome and prognostic indicators of diffuse proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis treated with sequential oral cyclophosphamide and azatioprine.
Arthritis Rheum, 46 (2002), pp. 1003-1013
[9.]
S.A. Houssiau, C. Vasconcelos, D. D’Cruz, et al.
Immunosupresive therapy in lupus nephritis. The Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial, a randomized trial of lowdose versus high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide.
Arthritis Rheum, 46 (2002), pp. 2121-2131
[10.]
C.C. Mok, R.W. Wong, K.N. Lai.
Treatment of severe proliferative lupus nephritis: the current state.
Ann Rheum Dis, 62 (2003), pp. 799-804
[11.]
F.A. Houssiau, C. Vasconcelos, D. D’Cruz.
Early response to immunosuppressive therapy predicts good renal outcome in lupus nephritis. Lessons from long-term follow-up of patients in the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial.
Arthritis Rheum, 50 (2004), pp. 3934-3940
[12.]
L. Liang, X. Yang, H. Xu, et al.
Clinical predictors of recovery and complications in the management of recent onset renal failure in lupus nephritis: a Chinese experience.
J Rheumatol, 31 (2004), pp. 701-706
[13.]
E.M. Ginzler, C. Aranow.
Mycophenolate mofetil in lupus nephritis.
Lupus, 14 (2005), pp. 59-64
[14.]
M.Y. Karim, P. Alba, M.J. Cuadrado, et al.
Mycophenolate mofetil for systemic lupus erythematosus refractory to other immunospressive agents.
Rheumatology (Oxford), 41 (2002), pp. 876-882
[15.]
T.M. Chan, F.K. Li, C.S. Tang, et al.
Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. Hong Kong-Guangzhou Nephrology Study Group.
N Eng J Med, 343 (2000), pp. 1156-1162
[16.]
T.M. Chan, R.W.S. Wong, C.S. Lau, et al.
Prolonged follow-up of patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis treated with prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil.
J Am Soc Nephrol, 12 (2001), pp. A1010
[17.]
C.C. Mok, K.N. Lai.
Mycophenolate mofetil in lupus glomerulonephritis.
Am J Kidney Dis, 40 (2002), pp. 447-457
[18.]
T.H. Mathew.
A blinded long-term, randomized multicenter study of mycophemolate mofetil in cadaveric renal transplantation: results at 3 years. Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group.
Transplantation, 65 (1998), pp. 1450-1454
[19.]
W.W. Epinette, C.M. Parker, E.L. Jones, M.C. Greist.
Mycophenolic acid for psoriasis: a review of pharmacology, long-term efficacy and safety.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 17 (1987), pp. 962-971
[20.]
P.P. Kapitsinou, J.N. Boletis, F.N. Skopouli, et al.
Lupus nephritis: treatment with mycophenolate mofetil.
Rheumatology, 43 (2004), pp. 377-380
[21.]
G. Contreras, V. Pardo, B. Leclercq, et al.
Sequential therapies for proliferative lupus nephritis.
N Eng J Med, 350 (2004), pp. 971-980
[22.]
T.M. Chan, K.C. Tse, C. Siu-On Tang, et al.
Long-term study of mycophenolate mofetil as continuous induction and maintenance treatment for diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis.
J Am Soc Nephrol, 16 (2005), pp. 1076-1084
[23.]
C.N. Pisoni, F.J. Sánchez, Karim., et al.
Mycophenolate mofetil in systemic lupus erythematosus: efficacy and tolerability in 86 patients.
J Rheumatol, 32 (2005), pp. 1047-1052
[24.]
E.M. Ginzler, C. Aranow.
Mycophenolate mofetil in lupus nephritis.
Lupus, 14 (2005), pp. 59-64
[25.]
L.S. Tam, E.K. Li, C.B. Leung, et al.
Long-term treatment of lupus nephritis with cyclosporin A.
QJ Med, 91 (1998), pp. 573-580
[26.]
D. Alarcón-Segovia, J.A. Tumlin, R.A. Furie, et al.
LJP 394 for the prevention of renal flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Arthritis Rheum, 2 (2003), pp. 442-454
[27.]
P.P. Sfikakis, J.N. Boletis, S. Lionaki, et al.
Remission of proliferative lupus nephritis following B cell depletion therapy is preceded by down-regulation of the T cell costimulatory molecule CD40 ligand. An open-label trial.
Arthritis Rheum, 52 (2005), pp. 501-513
[28.]
D.T. Boumpas, H.A. Austin III, E.M. Vaughan, et al.
Risk for sustained amenorrhea in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus receiving intermittent pulse cyclophosphamide therapy.
Ann Intern Med, 119 (1993), pp. 366-369
[29.]
C.L. Wang, F. Wang, J.J. Bosco.
Ovarian failure in oral cyclophosphamide treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus.
Lupus, 4 (1995), pp. 11-14
[30.]
J.M. Miranda, A. Urenda, L. Barile, et al.
Menstrual abnormalities in young patients treated with pulse cyclophosphamide vs methylprednisolone therapy.
58th Annual Meeting of the American College of Rheumatology, (1994), pp. 324
[31.]
J.M. Miranda, M. Rodríguez, L.J. Jara, et al.
Ovarian function hormonal studies in lupus nephritis patients treated with intravenous cyclophosphamide or methylprednisolone.
59th Annual Meeting of the American College of Rheumatology, (1995), pp. 347
[32.]
J.M. Miranda, R.M. Bustamante, I.A. González.
Hormone replacement therapy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Preliminary report of a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
64th. Annual Meeting of the American College of Rheumatology, 43 (2000), pp. 1112
[33.]
V.M. Ognenovski, W. Marder, E.C. Somers, et al.
Increased incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with intravenous cyclophosphamide.
J Rheumatol, 31 (2004), pp. 1763-1767
[34.]
F.J. Aceves-Ávila, G.A. Esquivel-Nava, M.P. Gallegos Arreola, et al.
Cyclophosphamide boluses induce micronuclei expression in bucal mucosa cells of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus independent of cytochrome P450 2D6 status.
J Rheumatol, 31 (2004), pp. 1335-1339
[35.]
S. Shaunak, J.M. Munro, K. Weinbren, et al.
Cyclophosphamide-induced liver necrosis: a possible interaction with azathioprine.
Q J Med, 67 (1988), pp. 302-317
[36.]
G. Moroni, M. Maccario, S. Fargion, C. Ponticelli.
Severe and prolonged jaundice in a lupus nephritis patient treated with cyclophosphamide.
Nephrol Dial Transplant, 12 (1997), pp. 793-796
[37.]
F. Medina, A. Fraga, C. Lavalle.
Salmonella septic arthritis in systemic lupus erythematosus. The importance of chronic carrier state.
J Rheumatol, 16 (1989), pp. 203-208
Copyright © 2006. Elsevier España S.L. Barcelona
Download PDF
Idiomas
Reumatología Clínica (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?