Contextualizing Osteoarthritis Care and the Reasons for the Gap Between Evidence and Practice
Section snippets
Best practice guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis (OA) is not an easy condition to manage. It is very heterogeneous, has an unpredictable natural history, and has variable effects on health status. As it primarily affects older adults it is often associated with comorbidities that have significant effects on its impact.1, 2 In addition, there is a wide range of management options available to patients and their health care advisors.3, 4, 5
Guidelines should help clinicians through this complexity. By synthesizing the best
The NICE guidelines on the management of osteoarthritis
There is clear consensus in the literature that empowering self-management alongside help with understanding the condition, encouraging general fitness and moderate activity, keeping muscles strong, and losing weight if obesity is present are the mainstays of the management of OA.3, 4, 5, 7, 11 Interventions that require medical supervision and/or have potential adverse effects should only be used if these measures are insufficient, and if the patient wants them. Within the NICE guideline these
Contextualizing care
NICE strongly emphasizes that management needs to be both individualized and patient-centered.11 This requires an “holistic” approach with careful patient assessment, taking into account a variety of other variables, including:
- 1.
OA-related factors (eg, the site and number of joints involved, the severity of joint damage, and any associated muscle weakness or periarticular problems)
- 2.
Person-specific factors (eg, age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic and educational status, activity requirements,
The gap between evidence and practice
Useful guidelines that exist for the management of people with OA should help health care practitioners deal with the complexity of the condition and their patients. However, there is good evidence that the management of OA remains poor and that most people who seek help for this condition are not managed in accordance with the best practice guidance available.15, 16, 17, 18 Therefore there is, in the management of OA as in so many other chronic diseases, a gap between what evidence-based
The 3 pillars of best practice
One of the reasons for the gap is that recommendations for best practice often focus on just 1 or 2 of the 3 pillars of best practice, which are:
- 1.
Research evidence (including clinical trials)
- 2.
The experienced practitioners' expert opinion and advice
- 3.
The patients' opinion and experience.
All 3 need to have equal weight if we are to claim that we have genuine “best practice” (Fig. 2).14
As discussed below, guidelines can only do full justice to the research-based evidence.
The pathway from research-based evidence to best practice
There is a complex pathway between the production of the evidence base to the optimum management of the patient, as shown in Fig. 3. There are serious problems within each step in the process, contributing to the gap between evidence and practice. Some of these problems are now briefly summarized.
Comorbidity and complexity
These aspects of OA were mentioned in the first paragraph of this article, and they represent another major barrier to the implementation of good management in OA, and possible explanation of the gap between evidence and practice.
OA is a disease of older people. It is associated with obesity (and therefore diabetes, hypertension, and other associated disorders), as well as other age-related conditions including cardiovascular disease, reduced renal function, and sensory deficits. Many older
The art of medicine and the context of care
The “art of medicine” involves good communication, compassion, and caring. It is about individualizing treatment and finding the person behind the patient, and is centered around the clinical encounter between patient and health care professional.46, 47
Good communication allows the health care professional to find out what matters most to an individual, and to treat them as a whole person rather than someone with a disease (or set of diseases). As an example, based on data quoted earlier,
A way forward: contextualizing osteoarthritis care
OA is common and important—people with it deserve the best available help.There are two sides to that: The patient: self-management and taking responsibility is as important as anything that the health care professionals can offer. The health care professionals: they need to realize the shortcomings of EBM and guidelines in the management of complexity and comorbidities in older people, and to understand the importance of context, communication, and caring.
This means that we need a different framework and model for the care
References (54)
- et al.
Pathogenesis and management of pain in osteoarthritis
Lancet
(2005) - et al.
Osteoarthritis: rational approach to treating the individual
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol
(2006) - et al.
OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Part I: critical appraisal of existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence
Osteoarthritis Cartilage
(2007) - et al.
OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines
Osteoarthritis Cartilage
(2008) - et al.
Differences between the ACR and EULAR guidelines on management of knee osteoarthritis
Rheum Dis Clin North Am
(2003) - et al.
Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature
J Clin Epidemiol
(2000) - et al.
Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer
Lancet
(2000) - et al.
Evidence-based management of osteoarthritis: practical issues relating to the data
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol
(2001) - et al.
The “placebo” response in osteoarthritis and its implications for clinical practice
Osteoarthritis Cartilage
(2009) - et al.
Determinants of reduced walking speed in people with musculoskeletal pain
J Rheumatol
(2007)
Clinical co-morbidity in osteoarthritis: associations with physical function in older patients in family practice
J Rheumatol
Managing osteoarthritis
Practitioner
EULAR Recommendations: an evidence based medicine approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis. Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee of Clinical Trials and International Studies
Ann Rheum Dis
EULAR recommendations: an evidence based medicine approach to the management of hip osteoarthritis. Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee of Clinical Trials and International Studies
Ann Rheum Dis
EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis. Report of a Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee of Clinical Trials and International Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT)
Ann Rheum Dis
Osteoarthritis - national clinical guideline for care and management in adults
Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: 2000 update
Arthritis Rheum
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
BMJ
OA Nation
Unmet need for joint replacement: a qualitative investigation of barriers to treatment among individuals with severe pain and disability of the hip and knee
Rheumatology
Knee osteoarthritis clinical practice Guidelines. How are we doing?
J Rheumatol
Help-seeking behaviour among people living with chronic hip or knee pain in the community
BMC Musculoskelet Disord
The truth about drug companies: how they deceive us and what to do about it
Evidence-based medicine or medicines-based evidence?
Ann Rheum Dis
A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analysis of controlled trials with binary endpoints
Stat Med
Exploring the priorities of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
Arthritis Care Res
Epidemiology of research into interventions for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joint
Ann Rheum Dis
Cited by (11)
Best Evidence Osteoarthritis Care: What Are the Recommendations and What Is Needed to Improve Practice?
2022, Clinics in Geriatric MedicineCitation Excerpt :Recommendations differ between guidelines, both in the adjunctive therapies included and the strength of the recommendations. The lack of stakeholder engagement, potential lack of editorial independence, and potentially biased representation of committee members in the development of some leading practice guidelines have received criticism.37,38 This lack of consensus potentially influences the interpretation and application of guidelines at the practitioner and consumer levels.
Barriers to implementing the "2008 Mexican Clinical Practice Guideline recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis" in primary healthcare practice
2014, Reumatologia ClinicaCitation Excerpt :The Northern team identified individual barriers, the Central team identified organizational and system-related barriers, and the Southern team identified individual, organizational and system-related barriers. This shows how the context could influence the implementability of a recommendation, supporting the argument that CPGs have to be adapted to local conditions.44 Furthermore, the identification of organizational and system-related barriers suggests that not considering local socioeconomic and political factors may result in the failure to implement the CPG.
Chronic Disease Management. A Review of Current Performance Across Quality of Care Domains and Opportunities for Improving Osteoarthritis Care.
2013, Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :The Institute of Medicine in the United States advocates for 6 pillars to improve care: safety, effectiveness, patient-centered care, timeliness, efficiency, and equity (Table 1).2 There is a useful existing commentary about the ways in which care for people with OA can be improved.3–7 This article builds on these sources by exploring system, health care provider, and patient barriers and enablers to improving care for OA in relation to the Institute of Medicine's 6 pillars for improving chronic care health services.
Patient information and emotional needs across the hip osteoarthritis continuum: A qualitative study
2016, BMC Health Services ResearchQuality of osteoarthritis care in family medicine – A cross-sectional study
2016, Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo