was read the article
array:24 [ "pii" => "S2173574319301248" "issn" => "21735743" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reumae.2018.07.010" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2020-09-01" "aid" => "1262" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Reumatología y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología" "copyrightAnyo" => "2018" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Reumatol Clin. 2020;16:324-32" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S1699258X1830175X" "issn" => "1699258X" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reuma.2018.07.016" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2020-09-01" "aid" => "1262" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Reumatología y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Reumatol Clin. 2020;16:324-32" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 895 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 15 "HTML" => 779 "PDF" => 101 ] ] "es" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original</span>" "titulo" => "Eficacia y seguridad de la terapia combinada con fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad sintéticos en la artritis reumatoide: revisión sistemática de la literatura" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "en" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "324" "paginaFinal" => "332" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Efficacy and Safety of Combined Therapy With Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Systematic Literature Review" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figura 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1061 "Ancho" => 2172 "Tamanyo" => 142794 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "es" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Diagrama de flujo de los estudios.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Jaime Calvo Alén, Trinidad Pérez, Susana Romero Yuste, Iván Ferraz-Amaro, Juan José Alegre Sancho, José Antonio Pinto Tasende, Francisco Maceiras Pan, Juan Carlos Quevedo, M. Vanesa Hernández-Hernández, Cristina Hidalgo Calleja, Alejandro San Martín Álvarez, María Isabel Tevar Sánchez, Raimon Sanmartí" "autores" => array:13 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jaime" "apellidos" => "Calvo Alén" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Trinidad" "apellidos" => "Pérez" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Susana" "apellidos" => "Romero Yuste" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Iván" "apellidos" => "Ferraz-Amaro" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Juan José" "apellidos" => "Alegre Sancho" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "José Antonio" "apellidos" => "Pinto Tasende" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Francisco" "apellidos" => "Maceiras Pan" ] 7 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Juan Carlos" "apellidos" => "Quevedo" ] 8 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M. Vanesa" "apellidos" => "Hernández-Hernández" ] 9 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Cristina" "apellidos" => "Hidalgo Calleja" ] 10 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Alejandro" "apellidos" => "San Martín Álvarez" ] 11 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "María Isabel Tevar" "apellidos" => "Sánchez" ] 12 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Raimon" "apellidos" => "Sanmartí" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S2173574319301248" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reumae.2018.07.010" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173574319301248?idApp=UINPBA00004M" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1699258X1830175X?idApp=UINPBA00004M" "url" => "/1699258X/00000016000005P1/v1_202008070719/S1699258X1830175X/v1_202008070719/es/main.assets" ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S2173574319301236" "issn" => "21735743" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reumae.2018.07.009" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2020-09-01" "aid" => "1260" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Reumatología y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Reumatol Clin. 2020;16:333-8" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:12 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) consensus on Spanish nomenclature for spondyloarthritis" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "333" "paginaFinal" => "338" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Consenso ASAS en nomenclatura en español para las espondiloartritis" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Victoria Navarro-Compán, Teresa Otón, Estíbaliz Loza, Raquel Almodóvar, Rafael Ariza-Ariza, Wilson Bautista-Molano, Rubén Burgos-Vargas, Eduardo Collantes-Estévez, Eugenio de Miguel, Carlos González-Fernández, Jordi Gratacós, Sebastián Ibáñez, Xavier Juanola, Jose Maldonado-Cocco, Anna Moltó, Juan Mulero, Cesar Pacheco-Tena, Cesar Ramos-Remus, Jesús Sanz-Sanz, Rafael Valle-Oñate, Pedro Zarco, Helena Marzo-Ortega" "autores" => array:22 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Victoria" "apellidos" => "Navarro-Compán" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Teresa" "apellidos" => "Otón" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Estíbaliz" "apellidos" => "Loza" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Raquel" "apellidos" => "Almodóvar" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Rafael" "apellidos" => "Ariza-Ariza" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Wilson" "apellidos" => "Bautista-Molano" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Rubén" "apellidos" => "Burgos-Vargas" ] 7 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Eduardo" "apellidos" => "Collantes-Estévez" ] 8 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Eugenio" "apellidos" => "de Miguel" ] 9 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Carlos" "apellidos" => "González-Fernández" ] 10 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jordi" "apellidos" => "Gratacós" ] 11 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Sebastián" "apellidos" => "Ibáñez" ] 12 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Xavier" "apellidos" => "Juanola" ] 13 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jose" "apellidos" => "Maldonado-Cocco" ] 14 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Anna" "apellidos" => "Moltó" ] 15 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Juan" "apellidos" => "Mulero" ] 16 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Cesar" "apellidos" => "Pacheco-Tena" ] 17 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Cesar" "apellidos" => "Ramos-Remus" ] 18 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jesús" "apellidos" => "Sanz-Sanz" ] 19 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Rafael" "apellidos" => "Valle-Oñate" ] 20 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Pedro" "apellidos" => "Zarco" ] 21 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Helena" "apellidos" => "Marzo-Ortega" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S1699258X18301736" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reuma.2018.07.014" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1699258X18301736?idApp=UINPBA00004M" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173574319301236?idApp=UINPBA00004M" "url" => "/21735743/00000016000005P1/v1_202008141736/S2173574319301236/v1_202008141736/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:18 [ "pii" => "S2173574320300897" "issn" => "21735743" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reumae.2018.08.009" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2020-09-01" "aid" => "1264" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Reumatología y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Reumatol Clin. 2020;16:319-23" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:12 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Biological Dose Tapering in Daily Clinical Practice: A 10 Year Follow-up Study" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "319" "paginaFinal" => "323" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Optimización de la dosis de biológicos en práctica clínica: experiencia de 10 años" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Mercedes Alperi-López, Sara Alonso-Castro, Isla Morante-Bolado, Rubén Queiro-Silva, José Luis Riestra-Noriega, Luis Arboleya, Francisco Javier Ballina-García" "autores" => array:7 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Mercedes" "apellidos" => "Alperi-López" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Sara" "apellidos" => "Alonso-Castro" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Isla" "apellidos" => "Morante-Bolado" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Rubén" "apellidos" => "Queiro-Silva" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "José Luis" "apellidos" => "Riestra-Noriega" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Luis" "apellidos" => "Arboleya" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Francisco Javier" "apellidos" => "Ballina-García" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173574320300897?idApp=UINPBA00004M" "url" => "/21735743/00000016000005P1/v1_202008141736/S2173574320300897/v1_202008141736/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:22 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Efficacy and safety of combined therapy with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: Systematic literature review" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "324" "paginaFinal" => "332" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "Jaime Calvo Alén, Trinidad Pérez, Susana Romero Yuste, Iván Ferraz-Amaro, Juan José Alegre Sancho, José Antonio Pinto Tasende, Francisco Maceiras Pan, Juan Carlos Quevedo, M. Vanesa Hernández-Hernández, Cristina Hidalgo Calleja, Alejandro San Martín Álvarez, María Isabel Tevar Sánchez, Raimon Sanmartí" "autores" => array:13 [ 0 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "Jaime" "apellidos" => "Calvo Alén" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "jcalvo@ser.es" ] "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Trinidad" "apellidos" => "Pérez" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Susana" "apellidos" => "Romero Yuste" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Iván" "apellidos" => "Ferraz-Amaro" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">d</span>" "identificador" => "aff0020" ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Juan José" "apellidos" => "Alegre Sancho" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">e</span>" "identificador" => "aff0025" ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "José Antonio" "apellidos" => "Pinto Tasende" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">f</span>" "identificador" => "aff0030" ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Francisco" "apellidos" => "Maceiras Pan" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">g</span>" "identificador" => "aff0035" ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Juan Carlos" "apellidos" => "Quevedo" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">h</span>" "identificador" => "aff0040" ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "M. Vanesa" "apellidos" => "Hernández-Hernández" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">d</span>" "identificador" => "aff0020" ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Cristina" "apellidos" => "Hidalgo Calleja" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">i</span>" "identificador" => "aff0045" ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Alejandro" "apellidos" => "San Martín Álvarez" "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">j</span>" "identificador" => "aff0050" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">k</span>" "identificador" => "aff0055" ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "María Isabel" "apellidos" => "Tevar Sánchez" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">l</span>" "identificador" => "aff0060" ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Raimon" "apellidos" => "Sanmartí" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">m</span>" "identificador" => "aff0065" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:13 [ 0 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Araba, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain" "etiqueta" => "a" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital de León, León, Spain" "etiqueta" => "b" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 2 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain" "etiqueta" => "c" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] 3 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain" "etiqueta" => "d" "identificador" => "aff0020" ] 4 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Sección de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain" "etiqueta" => "e" "identificador" => "aff0025" ] 5 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain" "etiqueta" => "f" "identificador" => "aff0030" ] 6 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Spain" "etiqueta" => "g" "identificador" => "aff0035" ] 7 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain" "etiqueta" => "h" "identificador" => "aff0040" ] 8 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Complejo Asistencial de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain" "etiqueta" => "i" "identificador" => "aff0045" ] 9 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Sección Reumatología, Clínica HLA Vistahermosa, Alicante, Spain" "etiqueta" => "j" "identificador" => "aff0050" ] 10 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Sección Reumatología, Hospital HLA, Denia, Spain" "etiqueta" => "k" "identificador" => "aff0055" ] 11 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Vega Baja, Orihuela, Spain" "etiqueta" => "l" "identificador" => "aff0060" ] 12 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitari Clínic, Barcelona, Spain" "etiqueta" => "m" "identificador" => "aff0065" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Eficacia y seguridad de la terapia combinada con fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad sintéticos en la artritis reumatoide: revisión sistemática de la literatura" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1061 "Ancho" => 2172 "Tamanyo" => 145472 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Flow diagram of studies.</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has changed enormously in recent years. New drugs and treatment strategies have completely changed the prognosis of these patients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1–4</span></a> Synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) like methotrexate (MTX) or leflunomide (LEF) have been and continue to be essential therapies for the management of these patients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0195"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5–7</span></a> However, with new findings in the disease pathogenesis and the appearance of biologic therapies recommendations on their use has changed.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0210"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8–10</span></a></p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">For example, in the latest updating of the EULAR consensus document on RA management (2016),<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> albeit with great controversy, one recommendation from the 2013 issue was finally excluded,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11</span></a> which suggested in DMARD naive RA, regardless of the use of combined corticosteroids, conventional synthetic DMARD should be used as monotherapy or in combination therapy. There are different reasons for definitively excluding combined therapy in initial treatment, from the higher effect when combined with biologics compared to the combination of the DMARD themselves to the higher number of adverse events compared with monotherapy. In the same document and, regarding refractory patients or those with toxicity to initial treatment, if no bad prognostic factors present, therapy combined with MTX, LEF or salazopyrin (SSZ) is a recommended option and they show that the combination of the 3 is the most common therapy used.</p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">However, even with this present, unresolved questions remain. For example, relating to the use of combined therapy with synthetic DMARD, although arguments against this are cited, are they really sufficient so as to exclude this model of treatment in early RA? Also, in the case of established RA which are refractory to initial treatment and where there are no poor prognostic factors, which combined therapy would be the most appropriate?</p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The NEXUS Project is an annual activity where, based on the best evidence and experience possible, an attempt is made to respond to issues in RA which are. As a result, and bearing in mind everything commented above, in the context of this project, the aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to evaluate some aspects on efficacy and safety of combined therapy with synthetic DMARD in RA and subsequently issue a series of practical recommendations to serve as guidelines for clinicians in their daily practice.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Methods</span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">NEXUS Project</span><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This publication forms part of the NEXUS Project. This is led by 2 national coordinators (rheumatologist experts) and comprises 8 work groups, each with a regional coordinator and 2 or 3 reviewers (depending on the group), for a total of 22 reviewers. Every year different subjects of interest in the field of RA are analysed. In the 2017–2018 issue this was the use of corticosteroids and combined therapy with synthetic DMARD in RA. In this publication we describe the SLR referring to the question on combined therapy in RA. The Spanish Society of Rheumatology guarantees that the methodology used is appropriate, but does not endorse the conclusions because the Spanish Society of Rheumatology has official policies in this regard.</p></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Review protocol</span><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Initially, one of the national coordinators put forward the following questions which were responded to through an SLR:”In early RA patients, is combined therapy with synthetic DMARD better than sequential therapy with synthetic DMARD? In established RA patients who are refractory to standard first line therapy (synthetic DMARD), is the combination of MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LEF or triple synthetic DMARD therapy effective and safe?” The SLR protocol was defined with these questions.</p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">PICO and study selection criteria</span><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The 2 clinical questions were transformed into the PICO with which the inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined. For the first questions we selected studies which included patients with RA (international criteria or clinical judgement), early RA (≤2 years onset) adults (≥18 years), DMARD naive; being treated with combined therapy (double or triple) with synthetic DMARD with or without corticosteroids or other adjuvant drugs. Comparative studies had to have synthetic DMARD in sequential therapy (monotherapies or DMARD therapy with add-on drugs).</p><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">For the second question we selected studies which included patients with RA (international criteria or clinical judgement), adults (≥18 years), established RA (> 2 years onset), refractory to standard first line treatment (synthetic DMARD); being treated with combined MTX and LEF therapy or triple therapy with synthetic DMARD, with or without corticosteroids or other adjuvant drugs.</p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In both questions articles were sought whose outcomes analysed efficacy and safety variables regularly used in the study of RA. Finally, only those studies with the following designs were included: met analysis, systematic reviews and randomised clinical trials (RCT). Studies on animals and basic science were excluded.</p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Search strategy</span><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Aided by an expert documentalist search strategies were created for the different databases. For this they used the MeSH terms and terms in free text. Only articles on humans, in English or Spanish were included in the search.</p><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">For this review the following bibliographic data bases were screened: Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library (all from their initiation up until July 2017). Due to the volume of bibliographic references recovered, we decided not to review the grey literature of the main national and international rheumatology conferences. A manual search was subsequently performed secondary to the bibliography of the articles finally included. The <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#sec0090">supplementary material</a> shows the search strategy used, together with the number of references collected.</p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">All the references resulting from the searches were inserted into the EndNote programme for easier management.</p></span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0095">Article selection</span><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Following this, 2 reviewers created the first selection of articles resulting from the search strategy by reading the title and abstract, complying with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, each independently. Whenever a discrepancy arose, a third reviewer was taken on board to make a decision. After this, 11 reviewers made a second article selection through independent detailed reading and applying the same inclusion and exclusion criteria. To do this, the number of references collected was equally distributed among the 11 reviewers. Whenever a discrepancy arose, the other reviewer of the previous phase resolved the problem. In <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a> we show the flow diagram of the selection process of the articles, and in the <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#sec0090">supplementary material</a>, the characteristics of the studies included and excluded.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0100">Data collection and assessment of the study quality</span><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The 11 reviewers and one of the reviewers from the first selection stage, collected the study data included using specifically pre-designed templates). The Jadad<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0230"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">12</span></a> scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies included. Again, where discrepancies arose the other reviewer from the previous stage resolved the problem.</p></span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0105">Data analysis and presentation</span><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Tables of evidence and outcomes were created, where the main characteristics and outcomes of the included studies were described. Some of these were expressed as numbers and percentages (%), mean and standard deviation, mean and interquartile range (p25–p75), others as odds ratios, relative risk or hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). The possibility of performing meta-analysis was only assessed where there was homogeneity.</p></span><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0110">Nominal group meeting and drawing up of recommendations</span><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">During a 2-day nominal group meeting which all NEXUS Project members attended, the outcomes of the SLR were presented and discussed. A series of recommendations were agreed to. Each of the recommendations, with guidance from the methodologist, was assigned a level of evidence and a level of recommendation, in keeping with the recommendations for evidence-based medicine from the Centre for Evidence-based Medicine in Oxford.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0235"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a></p></span></span><span id="sec0055" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0115">Results</span><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Out of the 2603 references collected after the initial selection process 83 were assessed in depth and a further 3 through a secondary search. Finally, after an in-depth reading, no RCT were found which directly responded to the 2 questions (see excluded studies in the <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#sec0090">supplementary material</a>). Below are comments on some of the studies excluded in this SLR which did not meet with the criteria to be included, but provide relevant data and ideas in relation to the 2 research questions. <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a> outlines the main conclusions and recommendations.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia><span id="sec0060" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0120">Question 1. In patients with early RA is combined therapy with synthetic DMARD better than sequential therapy with synthetic DMARD?</span><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The BeSt study was a study designed to analyse, the effect of different treatment strategies in early RA. Patients were assigned to one of the 4 groups and if there was no response a therapeutic decision was quickly taken.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14–26</span></a> Patients therefore changed therapy (within their group) and even passed from one treatment branch to another. These groups were as follows: group 1 sequential monotherapy, group 2 combined sequential therapy (staged, i.e. monotherapy initiated and if response was insufficient another drug was added on), group 3 combined therapy with MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>prednisone (high doses with fast dose reduction) and group 4 combined therapy MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>infliximab (IFX). Data of up to 10 years follow-up was available, where the RA activity was evaluated, in addition to function, structure damage, quality of life and safety.</p><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the BeSt study, after one year,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0255"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> the groups treated with MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>prednisone and MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>IFX, demonstrated better control of the activity, function, radiographic damage progression than the other groups although they also presented with more adverse events (AE), with no differences being observed in bone mineral density. Progressively, in years 2–5,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0250"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16,19,20,26</span></a> these differences between the groups practically disappeared and specifically after 5 years,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0270"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20</span></a> 48% of the patients were in clinical remission (DAS28<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.6) and 14% in drug-free remission, regardless of the initial treatment group. After 5 years it was published that radiographic damage was lower in those patients who had started treatment in one of the combination groups.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0270"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20</span></a> After 10 years a subanalysis of ACPA-negative patients was performed reporting that the early use of MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>prednisone and MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>IFX was more effective compared with MTX as monotherapy.</p></span><span id="sec0065" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0125">Question 2. In patients with established RA who are refractory to standard first line treatment (synthetic DMARD), is the combination of MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LEF or the triple therapy of synthetic DMARD effective and safe?</span><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Three good quality RCT<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0305"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27–29</span></a> were found (one is really data added onto the other 2 studies). They include almost 1000 patients with RA, mostly established RA (mean duration from 5 to 18 years) and refractory to standard synthetic DMARD, especially to MTX (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a>). MTX was prescribed at a dose of 10–20 milligrams (mg)/week and LEF between 10 and 20<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/day. MTX in monotherapy was compared with MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>etanercept (ETN), MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and rituximab (RTX). All the patients included could take prednisone (up to 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/d). These RCTs analysed the efficacy (activity, function, quality of life) and safety of this combination up to 24 weeks.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The combination of MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LEF was statistically superior to MTX in monotherapy in ACR 20, 50 and 70, HAQ and SF-36 after 24 weeks of treatment in one of the RCT.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0310"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a> However, another 16-week study found that, although all of the combinations analysed improved the activity and function of the patients, the combination of MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ETN was higher than MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LEF in many of the variables which evaluated the activity of RA (ACR 20, 50, 70, DAS28, CDAI) and the function. Furthermore, in this study it was not possible to show the superiority of MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LEF compared with MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ or MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ in these patients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0305"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27</span></a> In the third study included, the combination of MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LEF was similar to MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>RTX (at intravenous doses of 500<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg in 2 doses) to improve the activity (evaluated among others with the DAS28 and the EULAR response), in changes in the acute phase reactants and depending on the patients at 24 weeks.</p><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Regarding safety, the expected AE were reported with the use of these DMARD, such as nausea, diarrhoea or elevated transaminases.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0305"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27–29</span></a></p><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">With regards to efficacy and safety of the triple therapy in established and refractory RA, the SLR included 3 good quality RCT,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0320"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30–33</span></a> which analysed the triple therapy with synthetic DMARD in patients with RA, most of which were established (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0015">Table 3</a>). The duration of the RCT was from 1 to 2 years, and included over 400 patients with RA of 6–10 years onset, active (DAS28 mean of 6), refractory to synthetic DMARD. In all cases the triple therapy consisted of MTX at a dose of 20<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/week, SSZ 1–2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/day and HCQ 400<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/day. The comparators in these RCT were MTX as monotherapy, MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ and ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX. All patients included could take stable corticosteroid doses (≤10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/d) and triggers evaluated were the RA activity (clinical and analytical), overall patient assessment (OPA), structural damage and safety.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0015"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the first RCT,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0330"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">32</span></a> published in 1996, triple therapy was significantly superior to MTX as monotherapy for improving the number of swollen joints, the OPA score and the physician global assessment (PGA). Equally, the combination of SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ improved the number of swollen, painful joints and the PGA, from medium to long term (2 years). Notwithstanding there were no differences in the ESR and duration of morning stiffness. Neither were there any differences in terms of safety.</p><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The RACAT study was a RCT of non inferiority, in which the triple therapy(MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ) was compared with the combination of MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ETN. After 24 weeks of treatment, MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ETN was statistically superior to the triple therapies in the percentage of patients who achieved low activity DAS28 (24.8% vs 34.8% <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.050), remission-DAS28 (12.7% vs 21.7% <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.030) and ACR70 (5% vs 16% <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001), with no differences in the other variables, including the reduction mean of the DAS28 which was the mean of the main trigger. However, after 48 weeks (where the patients could be assigned to the other branch if response was insufficient), there were no statistically significant differences between groups relating to RA activity (DAS28, CDAI, ACR response 20, 50, 70), the HAQ and radiographic progression (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0015">Table 3</a>). In open extension at 72 weeks,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0320"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a> adherence to treatment at one year was higher in the ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX group than in the triple therapy group, 78% vs 63%, and changes of regimen were higher from triple therapy to ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX than the inverse (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.005). The DAS28 continued to improve with no statistically significant differences between the groups.</p><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Regarding safety, the expected AE were reported for the use of these DMARDs, including infections and gastrointestinal disorders.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0320"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30–32</span></a></p></span></span><span id="sec0070" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0130">Discussion</span><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In this SLR we have tried to analyse some aspects relating to combined therapy with synthetic DMARD in RA patients. One of the questions relates to their use in early RA (this possibility is currently not included in the latest EULAR<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> recommendations). The other question was raised to analyse the combination of MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LEF and the triple therapy of MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ, in established RA patient's refractory to standard treatment with synthetic DMARD.</p><p id="par0140" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Notwithstanding, after the selection processes of the SLR, no article was included which met all inclusion criteria and the questions raised could not be directly answered. Despite this, with analysis of the RCT excluded in the same, we could extract a series of conclusions and recommendations relating to the questions.</p><p id="par0145" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Firstly, relating to the use of the combined synthetic DMARD in early RA, we exposed the results of the BeSt study. After its ten years existence,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14–22,24–26</span></a> we may conclude that what is really important is to begin early treatment and take decisions if the expected response is not obtained. Thus many studies in RA have demonstrated that an early diagnosis and treatment following a treat-to-target strategy clearly improves the prognosis of these patients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0185"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3,4,34</span></a> Although it is difficult to analyse, it has also been suggested that, although in the end the effect of the 4 groups is very similar, of the patients who began in some of the combined therapy groups, one included two synthetics DMARD: MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ but also in combination with high dose glucocorticoids) and had a faster response (although including high dose corticosteroids in one group and biologic therapy in the other may have had a great impact on outcomes) and a lower radiographic progression (possibly conditioned by the previous point). Later, relating to the question for the patients with established RA refractory to synthetic DMARDs, the combination of MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LEF, and of MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ, as put forward by EULAR,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> may be therapeutic options to assess in this patient profile, despite the low or nil accumulated scientific evidence. Specific high quality studies are required in this regard.</p><p id="par0150" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Nevertheless, this SLR has several limitations. The first and most important was the difficulty in finding studies that fitted in with the PICO of the research questions, and the review inclusion criteria. This was so to such an extent that it was not possible to find any studies which could directly provide an answer to this. Also, even with the RCT which we have commented upon being available, some of them have very small sample sizes which limit outcome generality and others require more long-term data to conclude with greater assurance. For example, in the BeSt study, respondents were able to change treatment within their group change group (there were 4). In this study, similarly to others, the DMARD doses could be changed. All of this complicates statistics and its interpretation.</p><p id="par0155" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">To conclude, although it has not been possible to answer all the questions raised directly in this SLR, we are convinced that the outcomes, conclusions and recommendations in this document may make a positive contribution to better knowledge of the use of synthetic DMARD in RA.</p></span><span id="sec0075" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0135">Financing</span><p id="par0160" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The NEXUS Project was financed by <span class="elsevierStyleGrantSponsor" id="gs1">Roche</span> which did not participate in the choice of subjects, or development of review, conclusions or recommendations.</p></span><span id="sec0080" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0140">Conflict of interests</span><p id="par0165" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:12 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres1374659" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Objective" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Methods" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1262801" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres1374658" "titulo" => "Resumen" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Objetivo" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Métodos" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Conclusiones" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1262802" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Methods" "secciones" => array:8 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "NEXUS Project" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Review protocol" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "PICO and study selection criteria" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Search strategy" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Article selection" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "Data collection and assessment of the study quality" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0045" "titulo" => "Data analysis and presentation" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0050" "titulo" => "Nominal group meeting and drawing up of recommendations" ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0055" "titulo" => "Results" "secciones" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0060" "titulo" => "Question 1. In patients with early RA is combined therapy with synthetic DMARD better than sequential therapy with synthetic DMARD?" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0065" "titulo" => "Question 2. In patients with established RA who are refractory to standard first line treatment (synthetic DMARD), is the combination of MTX + LEF or the triple therapy of synthetic DMARD effective and safe?" ] ] ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0070" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0075" "titulo" => "Financing" ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0080" "titulo" => "Conflict of interests" ] 10 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xack477565" "titulo" => "Acknowledgements" ] 11 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2018-04-11" "fechaAceptado" => "2018-07-19" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1262801" "palabras" => array:4 [ 0 => "Rheumatoid arthritis" 1 => "Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs" 2 => "Combined therapy" 3 => "Systematic literature review" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1262802" "palabras" => array:4 [ 0 => "Artritis reumatoide" 1 => "Fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad" 2 => "Terapia combinada" 3 => "Revisión sistemática de la literatura" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Objective</span><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">(1) To systematically and critically review the evidence of combined therapy with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and (2) to design practical recommendations on their use.</p></span> <span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0015">Methods</span><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed with a sensitive bibliographic search strategy in Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. We selected randomised clinical trials that analysed the efficacy and/or safety of (1) combined therapy of synthetic compared with sequential therapy of synthetic DMARD in early RA and (2) combination of methotrexate<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>leflunomide or triple therapy with synthetic DMARD in established RA refractory to synthetic DMARD. Two reviewers made the first selection by title and abstract and 11 performed the selection after detailed review of the articles and data collection. The quality of the studies was evaluated with the Jadad scale. Based on the results, related recommendations were agreed upon in a nominal group meeting.</p></span> <span id="abst0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0020">Results</span><p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Ultimately, no articles were included in the SLR. The analysis of the reviewed articles demonstrated the effectiveness of the treatment with synthetic DMARD following a “treat to target” strategy in early RA patients, and of combination therapy of synthetic DMARD in established RA refractory to synthetic DMARD. This resulted in 6 recommendations concerning combination therapy with synthetic DMARD.</p></span> <span id="abst0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Conclusions</span><p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">These recommendations aim to facilitate decision-making with the use of combined therapy with DMARD in RA.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Objective" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Methods" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] ] ] "es" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Objetivo</span><p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">1) Revisar sistemática y críticamente la evidencia sobre eficacia y seguridad de la terapia combinada con fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad (FAME) sintéticos en la artritis reumatoide (AR); 2) Emitir recomendaciones prácticas sobre su uso.</p></span> <span id="abst0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Métodos</span><p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura con una estrategia de búsqueda bibliográfica sensible en Medline, Embase y Cochrane Library. Se seleccionaron ensayos clínicos aleatorizados que analizasen la eficacia y/o seguridad de 1) la terapia combinada con FAME sintéticos comparada con la terapia secuencial con FAME sintético en la AR de inicio; y 2) la combinación metotrexato<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>leflunomida o la triple terapia de FAME sintéticos en la AR establecida refractaria a FAME sintéticos. Dos revisores realizaron la primera selección por título y abstract y 11 la selección tras lectura en detalle y la recogida de datos. La calidad se evaluó con la escala de Jadad. En una reunión de grupo nominal en base sus resultados se consensuaron una serie de recomendaciones.</p></span> <span id="abst0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Resultados</span><p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Finalmente no se incluyó ningún artículo en la RSL. Del análisis de los artículos revisados se encontró la eficacia en las AR de inicio del tratamiento precoz con FAME sintéticos siguiendo una estrategia «<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">treat to target</span>» y en AR establecidas refractarias a FAME sintéticos la de la terapia combinada con FAME sintéticos. Con ello se generaron 5 recomendaciones sobre la terapia combinada con FAME sintéticos.</p></span> <span id="abst0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Conclusiones</span><p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Estas recomendaciones pretenden facilitar la toma de decisiones con el uso de la terapia combinada con FAME sintéticos en la AR.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Objetivo" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Métodos" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Conclusiones" ] ] ] ] "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "☆" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">Please cite this article as: Calvo Alén J, Pérez T, Romero Yuste S, Ferraz-Amaro I, Alegre Sancho JJ, Pinto Tasende JA, et al. Eficacia y seguridad de la terapia combinada con fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad sintéticos en la artritis reumatoide: revisión sistemática de la literatura. Reumatol Clin. 2020;16:324–332.</p>" ] ] "apendice" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "apendice" => "<p id="par0180" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The following are the supplementary data to this article:<elsevierMultimedia ident="upi0005"></elsevierMultimedia></p>" "etiqueta" => "Appendix A" "titulo" => "Supplementary data" "identificador" => "sec0090" ] ] ] ] "multimedia" => array:5 [ 0 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1061 "Ancho" => 2172 "Tamanyo" => 145472 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Flow diagram of studies.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at1" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">AE: adverse events; ACR: <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">American College of Rheumatology</span>; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; ETN: etanercept; DMARD: disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; GR: grade of recommendation; HCQ: hydroxychloroquine; iv: intravenous; LEF: leflunomide; mg: milligram; MTX: methotrexate; LE: level of evidence; SSZ: salazopyrin.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Conclusions \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">In early onset RA…</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">An early treatment with a treat-to-target strategy improves the activity, damage, function and quality of life parameters in the short and medium term and maintains them long term (LE 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>b; GR B) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">In patients with established RA refractory to synthetic DMARDs…</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">The addition of LEF is better than MTX as monotherapy for improving activity, function and quality of life in the short to medium term, with no clear differences in AE (number of and severe AE) (LE 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>b; GR B) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">The combination of MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ETN appears to be superior to the combination of synthetic DMARD in optimising activity and function in the short term, particularly when the best outcomes are analysed (remission, ACR70) (LE 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>b; GR B) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">The superiority of MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LEF compared with MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ o MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ cannot be demonstrated in patients with established RA refractory to MTX, in the short term (LE 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>b; GR B) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">The combination of synthetic DMARD is similar to MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>RTX (at doses of 500<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg iv 2 doses) to improve activity and function in the short to medium term, with no clear differences relating to AE (number of and severe AE) (LE 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>b; GR B) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Triple therapy with MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ improves parameters of activity and radiographic damage (LE 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>b; GR B) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">The efficacy of triple therapy with synthetic DMARDs is comparable with the combination of ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (LE 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>b; GR B) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">The AE of triple therapy with MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ are those expected from the use of this type of drug (LE 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>b; GR B) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="2" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Recommendations</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">In patients with early RA a treat-to-target strategy is recommended, aimed at achieving remission as soon as possible (LE 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>b; GA A) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">In patients with established RA refractory to first line treatment with synthetic DMARD the option of using the combination of MTX y LEF is recommended, depending on the clinical context and the clinician's opinion (LE 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>b; GR B) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">If the combination of MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LEF (LE 5; GR D) is prescribed we recommend following the standard risk management guidelines. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">In patients with established RA refractory to first line treatment with synthetic DMARD we recommend bearing in mind the option of using the triple therapy with MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ, depending on the clinical context and clinician's opinion (LE 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>b; GR B) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Strict risk management is recommended in patients with RA who have been prescribed the triple therapy with MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ (LE 5; GR D) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab2360325.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Main conclusions and recommendations of the review.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0010" "etiqueta" => "Table 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at2" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Yrs.: years; AE: adverse events; ACR: American College of Rheumatology; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index; DAS: Disease Activity Score; durat.: duration; RCT: randomised clinical trial; ETN: etanercept; RF: rheumatoid factor; HAQ: Health Assessment Questionnaire; HCQ: hydroxychloroquine; AMI: acute myocardial infarction; iv: intravenous; LEF: leflunomide; ULN: upper limit of normality; max.: maximum; mg: milligram; MTX: methotrexate; NAD: number of painful joints; ns: not significant; PBO: placebo; CRP: C-reactive protein; RTX: rituximab; week.: week; SF: Short Form; SSZ: salazopyrin; sup: superior; op: oral pathway; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Study \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Population \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Intervention \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Efficacy \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Safety \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Fleischmann_2014 (aggregated data APPEAL<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Latin RA), durat. 16 week., Jadad 4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-Group ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>478): 89% women, mean age 48 yrs., DAS28 mean 6.4, durat. RA 7 yrs.-Group HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>81): 86% women, mean age 49 yrs., DAS28 mean 6.6, durat. RA 8 yrs.-Group SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>95): 91% women, mean age 47 yrs., DAS28 mean 6.6, durat. RA 7 yrs.-Group LEF<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>69): 89% women, mean age 49 yrs., DAS28 mean 6.2, durat. RA 8 yrs. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-Group ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX-Group HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX-Group SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX-Group LEF<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-% patients with ACR20Group ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>82%Group HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>59% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>54% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.01 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group LEF<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>62% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)-% patients with ACR50Group ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>56%Group HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>31% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>20% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group LEF<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>38% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.05 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)-% patients with ACR70Group ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>24%Group HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>12% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.01 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>6% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group LEF<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>7% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.05 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)-% patients with low activity DAS28Group ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>39%Group HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>20% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.01 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>14% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.01 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group LEF<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>20% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.01 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)-% patients with remission DAS28Group ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>18%Group HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>7% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.01 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>4% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group LEF<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>9% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span> not shown)-% patients with low activity CDAIGroup ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>54%Group HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>30% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.01 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX) (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.05 vs SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>18% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group LEF<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>42% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)-% patients with remission CDAIGroup ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>7%Group HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2%Group SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3%Group LEF<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3% (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span> not shown)-Δ DAS28:Group ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−2.7Group HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−2.0 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−1.5 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group LEF<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−1.8 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)-Δ CDAI:Group ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−26.7Group HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−21.1 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−17.4 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group LEF<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−17.7 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)-Δ HAQ:Group ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−.77Group HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−.47 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−.48 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX)Group LEF<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−.58 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span> not shown) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-Not analysed \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Kremer_2002, RCT double blind, active control, durat. 24 week., multicentre, international, Jadad 5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-Group LFN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>130): 76% women, mean age 55 yrs., durat. RA 10 yrs.-Group MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PBO (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>133): 76% women, mean age 55 yrs., durat. RA 10 yrs. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-MTX (15–20<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/week. or 10–15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/week., if max. dose tolerated)<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCB-MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LFN 100<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/day, 2 days → LFN 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/day (if activity, ↑ dose to 20<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/day)-Prednisone 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/day \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-% patients with ACR20MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LFN 46.2% vs MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCB 19.5%, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001-% patients with ACR50MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LFN 26.2% vs MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCB 6%, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001-% patients with ACR70MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LFN 10% vs MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PBO 2.3%, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.015-Δ HAQMTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LFN −.42 vs MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCB −.09, difference<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−.33 (95% CI −.44, −.21); <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001-Δ SF-36 Physical componentMTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LFN 6.8 vs MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCB .3, difference<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>6.5 (95% CI 3.9, 8.7); <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001-Δ SF-36 mental componentMTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LFN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3.0 vs MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCB 1.2 (ns) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-DiarrhoeaMTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LFN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>25.4%MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCB<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>13.5%-Upper respira. tract infect.MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LFN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>22.3%MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCB<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>24.1%-NauseaMTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LFN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>16.2%MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCB<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>11.3%-HeadacheMTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LFN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>10.0%MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCB<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>8.3%-RashMTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LFN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>7.7%MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCB<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>8.3%-DizzinessMTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LFN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>7.7%MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCB<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>5.3%-InfectionsMTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>LFN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>40.8%MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCB<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>51.9%-ALT<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3 ULNLFN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX 3.8%MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCB .8%-AST<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3 ULNLFN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX 1.5%MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCB .8% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Wijesinghe_2017, RCT, double blind, active control, durat. 24 week., multicentre, national, Jadad 5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-RTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>20): 80% women, mean age 44 yrs., DAS28 mean 6.88, durat. RA 5 yrs.-LFN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>19): 95% women, mean age 48 yrs., DAS28 mean 6.43, durat. RA 18 yrs. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-RTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX:RTX 500<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg iv days 0 and 14 months<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX-LEF<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX: LFN 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/day op (up to 20<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/day)<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX-All corticosteroids-NSAID and analgesics permitted \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-RTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX vs LFN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTXACR20: 85% vs 84% (ns)ACR50: 60% vs 64% (ns)ACR70: 35% vs 32% (ns)No response ACR: 15% vs 16% (ns)DAS28: 3.26 vs 3.25 (ns)DAS remission (<2.6): 20% vs 26% (ns)DAS low activity (<3.2): 40% vs 42% (ns)DAS moderate activity (3.2–51): 60% vs 58% (ns)DAS high activity (>5.1): 0% vs 0%Moderate EULAR response 60% vs 58% (ns)Good EULAR response: 40% vs 42% (ns)NAD: 1.8 vs 1.16 (ns)CRP: 6 vs 3 (ns)ESR: 28.05 vs 30.42 (ns)RF: 84 vs 60 (ns)HAQ: 2.872 vs 2.132 (ns) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-RTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTXSevere AE <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>5Infections <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>4Unstable angina <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1Deaths <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0-LFN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTXSevere AE <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3Infections <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1Cardiac events <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2Death <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab2360323.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Main characteristics and outcomes of the studies included with combined therapy of MTX and LEF.</p>" ] ] 3 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0015" "etiqueta" => "Table 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at3" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0075" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Yrs.: years; AE: adverse events; ACR: American College of Rheumatology; NSAID: non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; IC: inclusion criteria; CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index; Durat.: duration; DAS: Disease Activity Score; durat.: duration; DAS: Disease Activity Score; RCT: randomised clinical trial; ETN: etanercept; g: gram; gastroint: gastrointestinal; HAQ: Health Assessment Questionnaire; HCQ: hydroxychloroquine; ULN: upper limit of normality; mg: milligram; min: minutes, MTX: methotrexate; NAD: number of painful joints; NSJ; number of swollen joints; ns: not significant; week.: week; MS: morning stiffness; SSZ: salazopyrin; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Study \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Population \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Intervention \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Efficacy \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Safety \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">O’Dell_1996, RCT, double blind, durat. 2 yrs., multicentre national, Jadad 5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-MTX (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>36), 58% women, mean age 50 yrs., durat. mean RA 10 yrs., mean 1.6 previous DMARD-SZZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>35), 72% women, mean age 49 yrs., durat. mean RA 6 yrs.-MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>31), 65% women, mean age 50 yrs., durat. mean RA 10 yrs., mean 16 previous DMARD-CI: MTX 15–25<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/week. ≥12 week. Previous and DAS28 ≥4.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-MTX 7.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/week.-SSZ 500<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/12<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ 400<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/day-MTX MTX 7.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/week.<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ 500<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/12<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ 400<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/day-If no remission at 3 months ↑ MTX 12.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/week. → if no remission at 6 months ↑ MTX a 17.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/week.-Prednisone stable (≤10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/d) and permitted NSAIDs \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-ESRMTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>16 (ns vs triple therapy)SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ 16 (ns vs triple therapy)MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ 10-NPJMTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>7 (ns vs triple therapy)SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>7 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.016 vs triple therapy)MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3-NSJMTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>5 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.006 vs triple therapy)SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>7 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs triple therapy)MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2-MS (min)MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>63 (ns vs triple therapy)SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>50 (ns vs triple therapy)MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>38-OPAMTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.020 vs triple therapy)SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3 (ns vs triple therapy)MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2-PGAMTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.002 vs triple therapy)SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001 vs triple therapy)MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-no major differences between groups-MTX <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>7 discontinuations (2 pneumonia, 1 stomatitis, 1 diarrhoea, 1 nauseas, 1 vertigo, 1 sepsis-death)-SZS<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3 discontinuations (1 pneumonia, 1 diarrhoea,1 Crohn)-MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3 discontinuations (1 nausea, 1 cervical cancer, 1 weight gain)-<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0 ↑ GOT ≥2 ULN \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">O’Dell_2013, RCT, no inferiority, double blind, durat. 48 week., multicentre national (RACAT study), Jadad 5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>178), 77% women, mean age 58 yrs., durat. mean RA 5 yrs., DAS28 mean 5.8-ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>175), 85% women, mean age 56 yrs., durat. mean RA 4 yrs., DAS28 mean 5.9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-MTX (their regular dose)<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/day 6 week.<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>→<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/day<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ 400<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/day-ETN 50<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/week.<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (their regular dose)-If DAS28<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>↓<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.2 to 24 week. change to different regimen-SZZ could ↓ to 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/day if AE-Prednisone stable (≤10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/d) and permitted NSAIDs \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (48 week.)Δ DAS28 −2.12 vs −2.29 (ns)Δ HAQ −.46 vs −.64 (ns)Δ Modified Sharp score .54 vs 29 (ns)Δ CDAI −20.93 vs −21.56 (ns)DAS28 ≤3.2 37% vs 41.9% (ns)DAS28 ≤2.6 20.8% vs 25.2% (ns)ACR20 57.4% vs 65.8% (ns)ACR50 35.5% vs 42.6% (ns)ACR70 18.1% vs 26.5% (ns) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ76.6% any AE11.3% severe AE29.7% gastroint disorder25.2% infections-ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX75.3% any AE11.9% severe AE21.5% gastroint disorder37.4% infections \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Peper_2017, open extension of the RACAT study, durat. 72 weeks. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>145), 39% women, mean age 59 yrs., durat. mean RA 6 yrs., DAS28 mean 3.8-ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>144), 47% women, mean age 56 yrs., durat. mean RA 5 yrs., DAS28 mean 3.5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-MTX (their regular dose)<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/day 6 week.<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>→<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/day<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ 400<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/day-ETN 50<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/week.<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (their regular dose)-Si DAS28 ↓ <1.2 to 24 weeks. Change to another regimen-SZZ could ↓ to 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/day if AE-Prednisone stable (≤10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/d) and permitted NSAIDs \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-MTX<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SSZ<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>HCQ vs ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTXΔ DAS28 −3.03 (ns)NPJ, NSJ, OPA, ESR (ns)Adherence at one year 63% vs 78%Regimen changes greater from triple therapy to ETN<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>+<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MTX (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.005) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">-Not assessed \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab2360324.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Main characteristics and outcomes of the studies included with triple therapy.</p>" ] ] 4 => array:5 [ "identificador" => "upi0005" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAECOMPONENTE" "mostrarFloat" => false "mostrarDisplay" => true "Ecomponente" => array:2 [ "fichero" => "mmc1.pdf" "ficheroTamanyo" => 410418 ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0015" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:34 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0175" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J.S. Smolen" 1 => "R. Landewe" 2 => "J. Bijlsma" 3 => "G. Burmester" 4 => "K. Chatzidionysiou" 5 => "M. Dougados" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "76" "paginaInicial" => "960" "paginaFinal" => "977" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28264816" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0180" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J.S. Smolen" 1 => "D. Aletaha" 2 => "J.W. Bijlsma" 3 => "F.C. Breedveld" 4 => "D. Boumpas" 5 => "G. Burmester" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/ard.2009.123919" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "69" "paginaInicial" => "631" "paginaFinal" => "637" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20215140" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0185" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Long-term disease and patient-reported outcomes of a continuous treat-to-target approach in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis in daily clinical practice" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "G.A. Versteeg" 1 => "L.M.M. Steunebrink" 2 => "H.E. Vonkeman" 3 => "P.M. Ten Klooster" 4 => "A.E. van der Bijl" 5 => "M. van de Laar" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:2 [ "tituloSerie" => "Clin Rheumatol" "fecha" => "2018" ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0190" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Long-term outcomes of treat-to-target strategy in established rheumatoid arthritis: a daily practice prospective cohort study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "N.P.B. De Andrade" 1 => "R.M. da Silva Chakr" 2 => "R.M. Xavier" 3 => "D. Viecceli" 4 => "R.H.B. Correa" 5 => "C.M. de Oliveira Filho" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s00296-017-3695-4" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rheumatol Int" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "37" "paginaInicial" => "993" "paginaFinal" => "997" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28293776" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0195" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions in patients with early arthritis: a systematic literature review informing the 2016 update of EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "C.I. Daien" 1 => "C. Hua" 2 => "B. Combe" 3 => "R. Landewe" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000404" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "RMD Open" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "3" "paginaInicial" => "e000404" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28151539" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0014256519300189" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00142565" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0200" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Subcutaneous administration of methotrexate at high doses makes a better performance in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis compared with oral administration of methotrexate: a systematic review and meta-analysis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "D. Li" 1 => "Z. Yang" 2 => "P. Kang" 3 => "X. Xie" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.11.004" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Semin Arthritis Rheum" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "45" "paginaInicial" => "656" "paginaFinal" => "662" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26686022" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0205" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Leflunomide in monotherapy of rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analysis of randomized trials" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "D. Golicki" 1 => "M. Newada" 2 => "J. Lis" 3 => "K. Pol" 4 => "T. Hermanowski" 5 => "M. Tlustochowicz" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.20452/pamw.1131" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Pol Arch Med Wewn" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "122" "paginaInicial" => "22" "paginaFinal" => "32" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22353705" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0210" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "GUPCAR" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "Sociedad Española de Reumatología" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:1 [ "fecha" => "2015" ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0215" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "2014 update of the Consensus Statement of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on the use of biological therapies in rheumatoid arthritis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "R. Sanmarti" 1 => "S. Garcia-Rodriguez" 2 => "J.M. Alvaro-Gracia" 3 => "J.L. Andreu" 4 => "A. Balsa" 5 => "R. Caliz" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.reuma.2015.05.001" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Reumatol Clin" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "11" "paginaInicial" => "279" "paginaFinal" => "294" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26051464" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0220" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "2016 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "B. Combe" 1 => "R. Landewe" 2 => "C.I. Daien" 3 => "C. Hua" 4 => "D. Aletaha" 5 => "J.M. Alvaro-Gracia" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210602" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "76" "paginaInicial" => "948" "paginaFinal" => "959" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27979873" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0225" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J.S. Smolen" 1 => "R. Landewe" 2 => "F.C. Breedveld" 3 => "M. Buch" 4 => "G. Burmester" 5 => "M. Dougados" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204573" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "73" "paginaInicial" => "492" "paginaFinal" => "509" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24161836" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0264410X15018654" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "0264410X" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0230" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A.R. Jadad" 1 => "R.A. Moore" 2 => "D. Carroll" 3 => "C. Jenkinson" 4 => "D.J. Reynolds" 5 => "D.J. Gavaghan" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Control Clin Trials" "fecha" => "1996" "volumen" => "17" "paginaInicial" => "1" "paginaFinal" => "12" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8721797" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0235" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Medicine. CfEB. CEBM levels of evidence 2011" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "CEBM" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:2 [ "fecha" => "2011" "editorial" => "University of Oxford" ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0240" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Effectiveness of four dynamic treatment strategies in patients with anticitrullinated protein antibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "G. Akdemir" 1 => "I.M. Markusse" 2 => "L. Dirven" 3 => "N. Riyazi" 4 => "G.M. Steup-Beekman" 5 => "P. Kerstens" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000143" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "RMD Open" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "e000143" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27099776" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0245" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Aiming at low disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis with initial combination therapy or initial monotherapy strategies: the BeSt study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "colaboracion" => "FARR study group" "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "C.F. Allaart" 1 => "Y.P. Goekoop-Ruiterman" 2 => "J.K. de Vries-Bouwstra" 3 => "F.C. Breedveld" 4 => "B.A. Dijkmans" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Clin Exp Rheumatol" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "24" "numero" => "Suppl. 43" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17083765" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0250" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Comparison of treatment strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "Y.P. Goekoop-Ruiterman" 1 => "J.K. de Vries-Bouwstra" 2 => "C.F. Allaart" 3 => "D. van Zeben" 4 => "P.J. Kerstens" 5 => "J.M. Hazes" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.7326/0003-4819-146-6-200703200-00005" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Intern Med" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "146" "paginaInicial" => "406" "paginaFinal" => "415" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17371885" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0264410X1830210X" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "0264410X" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0255" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): a randomized, controlled trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "Y.P. Goekoop-Ruiterman" 1 => "J.K. de Vries-Bouwstra" 2 => "C.F. Allaart" 3 => "D. van Zeben" 4 => "P.J. Kerstens" 5 => "J.M. Hazes" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/art.21405" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arthritis Rheum" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "52" "paginaInicial" => "3381" "paginaFinal" => "3390" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16258899" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0260" "etiqueta" => "18" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Changes in hand and generalised bone mineral density in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M. Guler-Yuksel" 1 => "C.F. Allaart" 2 => "Y.P. Goekoop-Ruiterman" 3 => "J.K. de Vries-Bouwstra" 4 => "J.H. van Groenendael" 5 => "C. Mallee" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/ard.2007.086348" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "68" "paginaInicial" => "330" "paginaFinal" => "336" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18375540" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0265" "etiqueta" => "19" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Changes in bone mineral density in patients with recent onset, active rheumatoid arthritis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M. Guler-Yuksel" 1 => "J. Bijsterbosch" 2 => "Y.P. Goekoop-Ruiterman" 3 => "J.K. de Vries-Bouwstra" 4 => "H.M. Hulsmans" 5 => "W.M. de Beus" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/ard.2007.073817" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "67" "paginaInicial" => "823" "paginaFinal" => "828" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17644545" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0270" "etiqueta" => "20" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The impact of four dynamic, goal-steered treatment strategies on the 5-year outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis patients in the BeSt study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "N.B. Klarenbeek" 1 => "M. Guler-Yuksel" 2 => "S.M. van der Kooij" 3 => "K.H. Han" 4 => "H.K. Ronday" 5 => "P.J. Kerstens" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/ard.2010.141234" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "70" "paginaInicial" => "1039" "paginaFinal" => "1046" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21415052" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0275" "etiqueta" => "21" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "BeSt practice: the success of early-targeted treatment in rheumatoid arthritis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M. Van den Broek" 1 => "W.F. Lems" 2 => "C.F. Allaart" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Clin Exp Rheumatol" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "30" "numero" => "Suppl. 73" "paginaInicial" => "S35" "paginaFinal" => "S38" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23078756" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 21 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0280" "etiqueta" => "22" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Limited efficacy of conventional DMARDs after initial methotrexate failure in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis treated according to the disease activity score" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "S.M. Van der Kooij" 1 => "J.K. de Vries-Bouwstra" 2 => "Y.P. Goekoop-Ruiterman" 3 => "D. van Zeben" 4 => "P.J. Kerstens" 5 => "A.H. Gerards" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/ard.2006.066662" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "66" "paginaInicial" => "1356" "paginaFinal" => "1362" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17293364" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 22 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0285" "etiqueta" => "23" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Drug-free remission, functioning and radiographic damage after 4 years of response-driven treatment in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "S.M. Van der Kooij" 1 => "Y.P. Goekoop-Ruiterman" 2 => "J.K. de Vries-Bouwstra" 3 => "M. Guler-Yuksel" 4 => "A.H. Zwinderman" 5 => "P.J. Kerstens" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/ard.2008.092254" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "68" "paginaInicial" => "914" "paginaFinal" => "921" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18662933" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 23 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0290" "etiqueta" => "24" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Large-joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and its association with treatment strategy and damage of the small joints" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "L. Dirven" 1 => "M. van den Broek" 2 => "H.M. Kroon" 3 => "B.A. Grillet" 4 => "K.H. Han" 5 => "P.J. Kerstens" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rheumatology (Oxford)" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "51" "paginaInicial" => "2262" "paginaFinal" => "2268" ] ] ] ] ] ] 24 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0295" "etiqueta" => "25" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Disease flares in rheumatoid arthritis are associated with joint damage progression and disability: 10-year results from the BeSt study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "I.M. Markusse" 1 => "L. Dirven" 2 => "A.H. Gerards" 3 => "J.H. van Groenendael" 4 => "H.K. Ronday" 5 => "P.J. Kerstens" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1186/s13075-015-0730-2" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arthritis Res Ther" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "17" "paginaInicial" => "232" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321751" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 25 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0300" "etiqueta" => "26" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): a randomized, controlled trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "Y.P. Goekoop-Ruiterman" 1 => "J.K. de Vries-Bouwstra" 2 => "C.F. Allaart" 3 => "D. van Zeben" 4 => "P.J. Kerstens" 5 => "J.M. Hazes" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/art.23364" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arthritis Rheum" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "58" "numero" => "Suppl." "paginaInicial" => "S126" "paginaFinal" => "S135" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18240203" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 26 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0305" "etiqueta" => "27" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Short-term efficacy of etanercept plus methotrexate vs combinations of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs with methotrexate in established rheumatoid arthritis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "R. Fleischmann" 1 => "A.S. Koenig" 2 => "A. Szumski" 3 => "H.W. Nab" 4 => "L. Marshall" 5 => "E. Bananis" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rheumatology (Oxford)" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "53" "paginaInicial" => "1984" "paginaFinal" => "1993" ] ] ] ] ] ] 27 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0310" "etiqueta" => "28" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Concomitant leflunomide therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite stable doses of methotrexate. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J.M. Kremer" 1 => "M.C. Genovese" 2 => "G.W. Cannon" 3 => "J.R. Caldwell" 4 => "J.J. Cush" 5 => "D.E. Furst" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.7326/0003-4819-137-9-200211050-00007" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Intern Med" "fecha" => "2002" "volumen" => "137" "paginaInicial" => "726" "paginaFinal" => "733" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12416946" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 28 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0315" "etiqueta" => "29" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Leflunomide is equally efficacious and safe compared to low dose rituximab in refractory rheumatoid arthritis given in combination with methotrexate: results from a randomized double blind controlled clinical trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "H. Wijesinghe" 1 => "P. Galappatthy" 2 => "R. de Silva" 3 => "S.L. Seneviratne" 4 => "U. Saravanamuttu" 5 => "P. Udagama" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1186/s12891-017-1673-3" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "BMC Musculoskelet Disord" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "18" "paginaInicial" => "310" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28724365" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 29 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0320" "etiqueta" => "30" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Rheumatoid arthritis treatment after methotrexate: the durability of triple therapy versus etanercept" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "S.M. Peper" 1 => "R. Lew" 2 => "T. Mikuls" 3 => "M. Brophy" 4 => "D. Rybin" 5 => "H. Wu" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "69" "paginaInicial" => "1467" "paginaFinal" => "1472" ] ] ] ] ] ] 30 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0325" "etiqueta" => "31" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Validation of the methotrexate-first strategy in patients with early, poor-prognosis rheumatoid arthritis: results from a two-year randomized, double-blind trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J.R. O’Dell" 1 => "J.R. Curtis" 2 => "T.R. Mikuls" 3 => "S.S. Cofield" 4 => "S.L. Bridges Jr." 5 => "V.K. Ranganath" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/art.38012" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arthritis Rheum" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "65" "paginaInicial" => "1985" "paginaFinal" => "1994" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23686414" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 31 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0330" "etiqueta" => "32" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate alone, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine, or a combination of all three medications" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J.R. O’Dell" 1 => "C.E. Haire" 2 => "N. Erikson" 3 => "W. Drymalski" 4 => "W. Palmer" 5 => "P.J. Eckhoff" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1056/NEJM199605163342002" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "N Engl J Med" "fecha" => "1996" "volumen" => "334" "paginaInicial" => "1287" "paginaFinal" => "1291" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8609945" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 32 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0335" "etiqueta" => "33" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate and sulfasalazine, or a combination of the three medications: results of a two-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J.R. O’Dell" 1 => "R. Leff" 2 => "G. Paulsen" 3 => "C. Haire" 4 => "J. Mallek" 5 => "P.J. Eckhoff" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/art.10228" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arthritis Rheum" "fecha" => "2002" "volumen" => "46" "paginaInicial" => "1164" "paginaFinal" => "1170" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12115219" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 33 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0340" "etiqueta" => "34" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Targeting ultrasound remission in early rheumatoid arthritis: the results of the TaSER study, a randomised clinical trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J. Dale" 1 => "A. Stirling" 2 => "R. Zhang" 3 => "D. Purves" 4 => "J. Foley" 5 => "M. Sambrook" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208941" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Rheum Dis" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "75" "paginaInicial" => "1043" "paginaFinal" => "1050" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27026689" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0264410X16307010" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "0264410X" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "agradecimientos" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "identificador" => "xack477565" "titulo" => "Acknowledgements" "texto" => "<p id="par0170" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We would like to thank Roche for their involvement in the NEXUS Project. Also the members of the NEXUS group for their participation in review: Mercedes Alperi, Fred Antonio Anton Pages, Nagore Fernández-Llanio Comella. Also to Doctors Liliana Ercole and Estíbaliz Loza for their methodological and logistic coordination.</p>" "vista" => "all" ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/21735743/00000016000005P1/v1_202008141736/S2173574319301248/v1_202008141736/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "43294" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Original articles" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/21735743/00000016000005P1/v1_202008141736/S2173574319301248/v1_202008141736/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004M&text.app=https://reumatologiaclinica.org/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173574319301248?idApp=UINPBA00004M" ]
Year/Month | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 November | 5 | 6 | 11 |
2024 October | 48 | 23 | 71 |
2024 September | 38 | 20 | 58 |
2024 August | 58 | 35 | 93 |
2024 July | 50 | 26 | 76 |
2024 June | 49 | 25 | 74 |
2024 May | 43 | 23 | 66 |
2024 April | 42 | 32 | 74 |
2024 March | 30 | 36 | 66 |
2024 February | 26 | 34 | 60 |
2024 January | 29 | 27 | 56 |
2023 December | 23 | 28 | 51 |
2023 November | 53 | 55 | 108 |
2023 October | 32 | 27 | 59 |
2023 September | 137 | 48 | 185 |
2023 August | 169 | 21 | 190 |
2023 July | 26 | 26 | 52 |
2023 June | 24 | 26 | 50 |
2023 May | 37 | 27 | 64 |
2023 April | 52 | 16 | 68 |
2023 March | 56 | 27 | 83 |
2023 February | 38 | 26 | 64 |
2023 January | 31 | 13 | 44 |
2022 December | 80 | 30 | 110 |
2022 November | 90 | 40 | 130 |
2022 October | 87 | 48 | 135 |
2022 September | 33 | 26 | 59 |
2022 August | 38 | 43 | 81 |
2022 July | 33 | 42 | 75 |
2022 June | 49 | 50 | 99 |
2022 May | 49 | 38 | 87 |
2022 April | 51 | 43 | 94 |
2022 March | 54 | 54 | 108 |
2022 February | 52 | 49 | 101 |
2022 January | 64 | 51 | 115 |
2021 December | 27 | 31 | 58 |
2021 November | 36 | 39 | 75 |
2021 October | 62 | 62 | 124 |
2021 September | 35 | 36 | 71 |
2021 August | 30 | 30 | 60 |
2021 July | 23 | 28 | 51 |
2021 June | 32 | 33 | 65 |
2021 May | 53 | 47 | 100 |
2021 April | 91 | 86 | 177 |
2021 March | 47 | 25 | 72 |