Información del artículo
Abstract
Radiography is the most widely utilized imaging modality for measuring joint damage in early rheumatoid arthritis. Conventional radiography is, however, insensitive for showing bone erosions and is totally unsuitable for assessing synovial inflammation. The recognition of these limitations has led to intense interest in ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for assessing synovitis and bone erosions. Magnetic resonance imaging allows detection of bone marrow edema, which is considered to be a very early marker of inflammation as well as a “forerunner” of erosions.
Keywords:
Magnetic resonante
Sinovitis
Early diagnosis
Joint erosion
Resumen
Las radiografías continúan siendo la técnica más utilizada para evaluar el daño articular en la artritis reumatoide precoz. Sin embargo, su baja sensibilidad en la detección de erosiones y la imposibilidad de identificar la sinovitis ha propiciado la introducción de otras modalidades de diagnóstico por imagen, como la ecografía y la resonancia magnética (RM), que permiten la identificación directa de la inflamación sinovial y de las erosiones. La RM tiene la ventaja de permitir el diagnóstico del edema óseo, que se considera como un marcador precoz de inflamación activa y un precursor de la aparición de nuevas erosiones.
Palabras clave:
Resonancia magnética
Sinovitis
Diagnóstico precoz
Erosión articular
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
References
[1.]
F.C. Arnett, S.M. Edworthy, D.A. Bloch, D.J. McShane, J.F. Fries, N.S. Cooper, et al.
The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.
Arthritis Rheum, 31 (1988), pp. 315-324
[2.]
M. Nissila, H. Isomaki, K. Kaarela, P. Kiviniemi, J. Martio, S. Sarna.
Prognosis of inflammatory joint diseases. A three-year follow-up study.
Scand J Rheumatol, 12 (1983), pp. 33-38
[3.]
T.T. Möttönen.
Prediction of erosiveness and rate of development of new erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis.
Ann Rheum Dis, 47 (1988), pp. 648-653
[4.]
D.M. Van der Heijde, M.A. Van Leeuwen, P.L. Van Riel, A.M. Koster, M.A. Van’t Hof, M.H. Van Rijswijk, et al.
Biannual radiographic assessments of hands and feet in a threeyear prospective follow up of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.
Arthritis Rheum, 35 (1992), pp. 26-34
[5.]
D.M. Van der Heijde.
Joint erosions and patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.
Br J Rheumatol, 34 (1995), pp. 74-78
[6.]
F.M. McQueen, N. Stewart, J. Crabbe, E. Robinson, S. Yeoman, P.L. Tan, et al.
Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals a high prevalence of erosions at four months after symptom onset.
Ann Rheum Dis, 57 (1998), pp. 350-356
[7.]
M. Szkudlarek, E. Narvestad, M. Klarlund, Court-Payen, H.S. Thomsen, M. Ostergaard.
Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, and clinical examination.
Arthritis Rheum, 50 (2004), pp. 2103-2112
[8.]
M. Backhaus, T. Kamradt, D. Sandrock, D. Loreck, J. Fritz, K.J. Wolf, et al.
Arthritis of the finger joints: A comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Arthritis Rheum, 42 (1999), pp. 1232-1245
[9.]
R.J. Wakefield, W.W. Gibbon, P.G. Conaghan, P. O’Connor, D. McGonagle, C. Pease, et al.
The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A comparison with conventional radiography.
Arthritis Rheum, 43 (2000), pp. 2762-2770
[10.]
U.M. Dohn, B.J. Ejbjerg, Court-Payen, M. Hasselquist, E. Narvestad, M. Szkudlarek, et al.
Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints.
Arthritis Res Ther, 8 (2006), pp. R110
[11.]
U.M. Dohn, B.J. Ejbjerg, M. Hasselquist, E. Narvestad, Court-Payen, M. Szkudlarek, et al.
Rheumatoid arthritis bone erosion volumes on CT and MRI: Reliability and correlations with erosion scores on CT MRI and radiography.
Ann Rheum Dis, 66 (2007), pp. 1388-1392
[12.]
M. Ostergaard, B. Ejbjerg.
Magnetic resonance imaging of the synovium in rheumatoid arthritis.
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, 8 (2004), pp. 287-299
[13.]
C.G. Peterfy.
Magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: Current status and future directions.
J Rheumatol, 28 (2001), pp. 1134-1142
[14.]
J.A. Narváez, J. Narváez, Y. Roca, C. Aguilera.
MR imaging assessment of clinical problems in rheumatoid arthritis.
Eur Radiol, 12 (2002), pp. 1819-1828
[15.]
J.A. Narváez, J. Narváez, R. Ortega, E. De Lama, Y. Roca, N. Vidal.
Hypointense synovial lesions on T2-weighted images: Differential diagnosis with pathologic correlation.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 181 (2003), pp. 761-769
[16.]
F.M. McQueen, N. Stewart, J. Crabbe, E. Robinson, S. Yeoman, P.L. Tan, et al.
Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals progression of erosions despite clinical improvement.
Ann Rheum Dis, 58 (1999), pp. 156-163
[17.]
B. Ostendorf, A. Scherer, U. Modder, M. Schneider.
Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging of the forefeet in early rheumatoid arthritis when findings on imaging of the metacarpophalangeal joints of the hands remain normal.
Arthritis Rheum, 50 (2004), pp. 2094-2102
[18.]
D. McGonagle, P.G. Conaghan, P. O’Connor, W. Gibbon, M. Green, R. Wakefield, et al.
The relationship between synovitis and bone changes in early untreated rheumatoid arthritis: A controlled magnetic resonance imaging study.
Arthritis Rheum, 42 (1999), pp. 1706-1711
[19.]
J. Lee, S.K. Lee, J.S. Suh, M. Yoon, J.H. Song, C.H. Lee.
Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in defining remission of rheumatoid arthritis.
J Rheumatol, 24 (1997), pp. 1303-1308
[20.]
P.G. Conaghan, P. O’Connor, D. McGonagle, P. Astin, R.J. Wakefield, W.W. Gibbon, et al.
Elucidation of the relationship between synovitis and bone damage: A randomized magnetic resonance imaging study of individual joints in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.
Arthritis Rheum, 48 (2003), pp. 64-71
[21.]
F.M. McQueen, N. Benton, D. Perry, J. Crabbe, E. Robinson, S. Yeoman, et al.
Bone edema scored on magnetic resonance imaging scans of the dominant carpus at presentation predicts radiographic joint damage of the hands and feet six years later in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Arthritis Rheum, 48 (2003), pp. 1814-1827
[22.]
K. Palosaari, J. Vuotila, R. Takalo, A. Jartti, R.K. Niemela, A. Karjalainen, et al.
Bone oedema predicts erosive progression on wrist MRI in early RA–a 2-yr observational MRI and NC scintigraphy study.
Rheumatology (Oxford), 45 (2006), pp. 1542-1548
[23.]
C.G. Peterfy.
MRI of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis.
Ann Rheum Dis, 63 (2004), pp. 473-477
[24.]
F.M. McQueen, B. Ostendorf.
What is MRI bone oedema in rheumatoid arthritis and why does it matter?.
Arthritis Res Ther, 8 (2006), pp. 222
[25.]
E. Jimenez-Boj, I. Nöbauer, F. Kainberger, E. Cetin, S. Trattnig, J. Smolen, et al.
Bone marrow edema in MRI scans of patients with rheumatoid arthritis is caused by inflammatory infiltrates in the bone marrow.
Arthritis Rheum, (2006), pp. 54
[26.]
M. Ostergaard, C. Peterfy, P. Conaghan, F. McQueen, P. Bird, B. Ejbjerg, et al.
OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system.
J Rheumatol, 30 (2003), pp. 1385-1386
[27.]
F.M. McQueen, N. Benton, J. Crabbe, E. Robinson, S. Yeoman, L. McLean, et al.
What is the fate of erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis? Tracking individual lesions using X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging over the first two years of disease.
Ann Rheum Dis, 60 (2001), pp. 859-868
[28.]
M. Ostergaard, B. Ejbjerg, M. Szkudlarek.
Imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis: Roles of magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, conventional radiography and computed tomography.
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol, 19 (2005), pp. 91-116
[29.]
J. Narváez, E. Sirvent, J. Narváez, J. Bas, C. Gómez-Vaquero, D. Reina, et al.
Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging of the hand versus anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibody testing to confirm the diagnosis of clinically suspected early rheumatoid arthritis in the absence of rheumatoid factor and radiographic erosions.
Semin Arthritis Rheum, 38 (2008), pp. 101-109
Section credited by SEAFORMEC with 11.9 credits. Consult questions for each article at: URL: http://reumatologiaclinica.org.
Copyright © 2010. Sociedad Española de Reumatología and Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología
