Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 11. Issue 4.
Pages 261 (July - August 2015)
Vol. 11. Issue 4.
Pages 261 (July - August 2015)
Letter to the Editor
DOI: 10.1016/j.reumae.2014.12.010
Full text access
Reply to the Article “Comparing Demographics, Clinical Presentation, Treatment and Outcome Between Sle Patients Treated in One Public and One Private Health System in Santa Fe, Argentina”
Réplica al artículo «Comparación de datos demográficos, presentación clínica, tratamiento y desenlace de pacientes lúpicos tratados en un centro público y otro privado de salud en Santa Fe, Argentina»
Visits
...
María Marcela Schmid, Susana Graciela Roverano
Corresponding author
susanarove@yahoo.com.ar

Corresponding author.
, Sergio Oscar Paira
Sección Reumatología, Hospital Provincial José María Cullen, Santa Fe, Argentina
Related content
Reumatol Clin. 2015;11:26010.1016/j.reumae.2014.10.001
Maria Claudia Godoy Carrillo, Alejandra Meneses-Saco
Article information
Full Text
Dear Editor,

We thank you for the comments and suggestions made. We have carefully read the comments and we add that:

  • 1.

    In the “Results” section, the progress time of patients until the first consultation (public or private) was defined and we would like to clarify that demographic data, activity by SLEDAI, physical examination and lab data were obtained in the first consultation. This data is clarified again in tables 1 and 2. Likewise, we explained that the outcome data of the patients were (obviously) taken at the last consultation.

  • 2.

    In the “Results” section, it is explained that 116 patients were assisted in the public healthcare system and 43 in the private area. We also state that the same group of experts assisted both groups; therefore, it is incorrect to infer variability in the treatments, superposition or different periods of treatment.

  • 3.

    No section of the article mentions that informed consent was required. On the contrary, it is explained that it was not necessary due to the anonymous and retrospective nature of the study.

  • 4.

    The colleagues are confused about the question of the ethnic group, since this topic is not in the “Results” section, but in the “Discussion” section, and they are quotes from other authors. In addition, they are confused when they affirm it is data from our study, because we are mentioning data from Reveille et al.

We suggest a better reading of this work in order to make better suggestions.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Elena Carrera and Liliana Contini for their statistical help (Biometry Unit, Department of Mathematics, School of Biochemistry and Biological Sciences, UNL).

Please cite this article as: Schmid MM, Roverano SG, Paira SO. Réplica al artículo «Comparación de datos demográficos, presentación clínica, tratamiento y desenlace de pacientes lúpicos tratados en un centro público y otro privado de salud en Santa Fe, Argentina». Reumatol Clin. 2015;11:261.

Copyright © 2014. Elsevier España, S.L.U.. All rights reserved
Idiomas
Reumatología Clínica (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.